establish minimun contacts... then use to establish jursidiction over a non-resident
Back
Federal court system
Front
district courts
united states court of appeals
united states supreme court
Back
first step in the litigation process
Front
file a complaint and summons
Back
14th amendment
Front
incoperated so amendments apply to states
Back
Burden of proof - criminal
Front
beyond a reasonable doubt
Back
Common Law
Front
orginal definitions of the law, form old English Customs
Back
Precident
Front
previously decided cases that are used for ruling on other cases
Back
Doctrine of Stare Decisis
Front
must stand on perviously decided cases that are same/ similar, case precidents
Back
Burden of proof - civil
Front
perpondance of the evidence
Back
appelet court can:
Front
affirm, reverse, remand
Back
references that refer to filing a case
Front
code of civil procedure
civil code
rules of court
Back
circumstance one can appeal their case
Front
when there is an issue of law
Back
dissenting opinion
Front
appelet court ruling - justice disagrees with majority ruling
Back
Statutory Law
Front
statutes, written law
Back
Us congress
Front
enacts statutes on a federal level
Back
original jursidiction
Front
court where case begins
Back
affirm
Front
agree with lower courts ruling
Back
State jursidiction
Front
everything else
Back
judical requirments
Front
jurisdiction
Back
rule of four
Front
must have 4 of 9 justices to agree to hear case
Back
defendant
Front
Back
order of appeals in federal system
Front
district court appeals to united states court of appeal
then appeals to united states supreme court
Back
limited jursidiction
Front
court only hears their specific types of cases
Back
reverse
Front
disagree with lower courts ruling
Back
Criminal Law
Front
wrongs against society (crimes)
Back
writs of centiorari
Front
request to supreme court to hear case
Back
Primary Source of Law
Front
States law
Back
federal jursidiction
Front
falls under federal laws
Back
Civil Law
Front
wrongs against individuals (torts)
Back
Plantiff - civil
Front
injuried
Back
plantiff
Front
Back
majority opinion
Front
appellet court ruling- opinion of the majority of the justices
Back
Plantiff
Front
injured party, one filing lawsuit
Back
US Constitution
Front
Supreme Law of the land
Back
Section 2
(50 cards)
motion in limine
Front
gag order to keep press out of court, if there is a child involved
keepout someone while witness testifies
Back
interrogatories
Front
written questions given to the other side
to answer
Back
request for expert evaluations
Front
having your experts evaluate them
Back
how long to file a response
Front
30 days
Back
original jurisidtcion
Front
court hears case for 1st time
type of subject matter jursidiction
Back
defendant fails to file response
Front
failure to answer - default judgement
Back
ways to serve defenfant
Front
personal service
substitute service
publish in the newspaper
acknowldgement and recipt
Back
Voir Dire
Front
process of jury selection
Back
personal service
Front
handing them the documents
Back
challenges for cause
Front
unlimited time you can dismiss jurror
Back
advantages for filing state case in fed court
Front
less case load, get through quicker
Back
discovery
Front
process of gathering information during litigation
Back
defendant do after being served
Front
file cross complaint - sue them back
Back
complaint
Front
document that sets forth allegations on which relief should be granted
Back
majority opinion
Front
rule opinion of appelet case
Back
substitute service
Front
handing them to person over the age of 18 in the household
Back
depositions
Front
oral examination of someone
Back
district courts
Front
trial courts in federal system
Back
circuit courts, US court of appeals
Front
intermediate courts in federal system
Back
Plaintiff's arguments
Front
-tobacco failed to warn public of danger of use
-nicotine is addictive
- product causes cancer
- misleading advertising
Back
Steps in trial
Front
opening statements
plaintiff's case
defendant's case
closing arguments
jury deliberation
Back
methods of discovery
Front
interrogatories
request for production of documents
deposition
request for admissions
request for expert evaluations
Back
closing arguments
Front
step in trail when attourney argues case to jury
Back
appelet court
Front
subject matter jursidiction
Back
Summons
Front
formal notice that the lawsuit has begun and you are being sued
Back
pretrial conference
Front
judge and attorneys exchange information, witness lists, evidence lists, jury instructions, motions in limine
Back
venue
Front
geographical location of case
Back
summary judgement motions
Front
(summation) J
no trialble issue of fast
Back
preemptory challenges
Front
remove jurror without reason, only get six
Back
JC form
Front
fill in form used in filing complaint
Back
statory law
Front
body of law set by the governemnt
Back
codes
Front
laws arranged by subject matter
Back
complaint
Front
pleading that sets forth allagations upon which relief should be granted
Back
default judgement
Front
dont answer in 30 days
Back
state gov
Front
plantiff in criminal case
Back
challanges for cause
Front
unlimited, remove jurror with reason, cant be unibased
Back
cross examination
Front
attourneys examine other parties witnesses
Back
request for production of documents
Front
asking for specific documents relating to the case
Back
serves the defendant
Front
anyone over the age of 18, not a party to the case
Back
service of process
Front
serve the defendant summons and complaint
Back
ethical dilemma for Tobacco Company
Front
knowingly selling a product that is dangerous for the purpose of making profit
Back
answer
Front
admits or denys allegations and sets forth an affirmative defense
Back
response to being served
Front
answer
cross complaint
demmur
Back
demurrer
Front
failure to state cause of action, file instead of an answer
Back
pleading paper
Front
numbered paper used to file a complaint, must use specific formating
Back
Defendant's arguments
Front
-other causes of cancer (pollution, dietarty)
- nicotine is not addictive
-plantiff knew risks (was a risk taker in life)
- he quit (when it mattered to his life)
Back
request of admission
Front
asking to admit facts so they wont have to be proven in court