Section 1

Preview this deck

Citizen X is suing his neighbor Y for ramming his $7,000 car. This case could be heard in..

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (73)

Section 1

(50 cards)

Citizen X is suing his neighbor Y for ramming his $7,000 car. This case could be heard in..

Front

a state court

Back

judicial activism

Front

the belief that the Supreme Court justices should actively make policy and sometimes redefine the constitution

Back

Judiciary Act of 1787

Front

established lower federal courts

Back

original jurisdiction

Front

Trial court where a case is originally tried

Back

stare decisis

Front

"let the decision stand"; an informal rule of judicial policy based on precedents;the practice of basing legal decisions on established Supreme Court percents from similar cases

Back

Who influences the President's selection of judiciary appointees?

Front

Congress, The American Bar Association, and sitting judges

Back

Court of Veterans Appeals

Front

Congress set up this court to hear veterans' war claims for benefits & other veterans' problems

Back

Court of Appeals

Front

hears cases from all across the nation from the legislative courts and from district courts on certain cases, such as those involving patents, trademarks, or copyrights

Back

appellate jurisdiction

Front

The trial court that hears a case being appealed. If a person loses an appeal they may appeal to SCOTUS

Back

majority opinion

Front

most senior member of the majority decides who writes this opinion & will do so in consultation w/ other justices

Back

US Tax Court

Front

All civil cases involving taxes are heard in Tax Court. Most cases come from IRS & Treasury

Back

exclusive jurisdiction

Front

The authority of the federal courts alone to hear and rule in certain cases; cases involving a federal or foreign government official and cases that arises out of an act of Congress

Back

district courts

Front

courts of original jurisdiction - hearing both criminal & civil cases & their jurisdiction extends to most cases heard in fed. courts

Back

What are the justices duties?

Front

-deciding which cases to hear - explaining the decision (writing Court's opinion(s)) - dealing with requests for special legal actions that come from various courts/circuits - taking occasional additional duties like serving on special commissions

Back

Plaintiff

Front

Person bringing charges in civil suit/trial.

Back

Courts of the District of Columbia

Front

Federal district court; court of appeals & local courts to hear civil & criminal cases

Back

dual sovereignty

Front

state and federal authorities can prosecute individuals for the same crime

Back

Defendant

Front

Person who must defend against the complaint

Back

Loose Constructionist

Front

a person who believes that the national government could claim broad powers only implied in the constitution

Back

Court of military appeals

Front

Hears cases brought from military courts by members of the armed forces convicted of breaking military law

Back

constitutional court

Front

a federal court with constitutionally based powers and whose judges serve for life.

Back

Grand Jury

Front

people who hear charges against a person suspected of committing a crime. They then evaluate if there is enough evidence against a person to order him or her to stand trial

Back

criminal law

Front

defines crimes against the public order and provides for punishment

Back

civil law

Front

law that govern the relations between individuals and defines their legal rights

Back

Legislative Court

Front

a specialized court established to hear cases about and execute the legislative powers of congress

Back

Who establishes inferior federal courts?

Front

Congress

Back

Precedents

Front

a judicial decision that is used as a standard in later similar cases; the custom of settling a court case in accordance with earlier decisions on similar cases

Back

Constitutional law

Front

when federal courts determine cases based on how each judge interprets the Constitution

Back

judicial restraint

Front

the belief that the Supreme Court justices should not actively try to shape social and political issues or redefine the Constitution

Back

Writ of mandamus

Front

a court order which forces a government official to take a particular action

Back

Petit jury

Front

a trial jury, usually consisting of 6-12 people, who weigh evidence presented at a trial

Back

Jurisdiction

Front

the right to interpret and apply the law; a court's range of authority. In essence the restrictions on the kinds of cases a court may hear

Back

How many judges are on the Supreme Court?

Front

9

Back

Equality law

Front

principle which resolves the dispute on grounds of fairness

Back

Most cases come to the Supreme Court as a result of what?

Front

Writs of certiorari

Back

Which court was directly established by the Constitution?

Front

The Supreme Court

Back

Who appoints all federal judges?

Front

The President

Back

Court of international trade

Front

Court hears civil cases related to taxes & trade and is based in NYC but also hears cases from NOLA & San Fran

Back

Territorial Courts

Front

Constitution gives Congress power to make rules to govern US territories so Congress created court system to handle civil, criminal and constitutional cases

Back

Who confirms the federal judges?

Front

The Senate

Back

What are the chief justice's duties?

Front

- Presiding over sessions & conferences - He typically writes the majority opinion if he agrees w/ majority. - Supervises the general admin. of the fed. court system

Back

A person who favors a narrow view of the Constitution is called a

Front

strict constructionist

Back

strict constructionist

Front

a person who believes that the national government should exercise only the powers specifically mentioned in the constitution

Back

U.S. Claims Court

Front

hear claims about monetary damages

Back

Judicial Review

Front

the power (by SCOTUS) to determine if the laws are constitutional or unconstitutional

Back

dissenting opinion

Front

most senior member of the losing side decides who writes the opinion

Back

senatorial courtesy

Front

the practice in which a presidential nomination is submitted initially for approval to the senators from the nominee's state

Back

writ of certiorari

Front

"made more certain"; an order from a higher court requiring a lower court to send the record of cases for review

Back

concurrent jurisdiction

Front

the authority to hear cases shared by federal and state courts; cases involve citizens of different states

Back

concurring opinion

Front

1 or more justices who agree with the Court's decision for different reasons or who want to emphasize a point not made in the majority's opinion

Back

Section 2

(23 cards)

Amicus curiae briefs amount to a form of

Front

judicial lobbying

Back

"Rule of Four"

Front

a petition is heard if a minimum of 4 justices vote to accept the case (each justice voted aloud, one a time, starting w/ the chief and then according to seniority)

Back

Koon v. US (legal question)

Front

(California appeals court disagreed w/trial court's sentence of Rodney King police officer - SCOTUS sent it back to California courts for reconsideration)

Back

Marbury v. Madison

Front

That judge (William Marbury) asked SCOTUS for a writ of mandamus - a court order which forces a government official to take a particular action

Back

The most important factors influencing POTUS's selection of judges & justices appears to be

Front

ideology and partisanship

Back

SCOTUS uses the 14th amendment to apply portions of the Bill of Rights to state law by citing

Front

due process of law

Back

A kid is running away from one state into another state. This is which type of jurisdicition?

Front

concurrent jurisdiction

Back

A case on appeal reaches the Supreme Court via a writ of

Front

certiorari

Back

Issues with implementation

Front

- Public (sometimes) responds quickly - Other times implementation of a court's decision can take years or months

Back

Marbury vs. Madison, SCOTUS assumed the power to

Front

decide on the constitutionality of a law or an exec. action

Back

Minersville School District v. Gobitis

Front

- Two children were expelled for not saluting the American flag at school due to being Jehovah's Witnesses. Result: SC ruled that the salute does not infringe on liberties protected by the 1st and 14th. National unity. - in the state's interest - Precedent gives continuity and stability to the meaning of law & sets standard for measurement of justice. -Times & attitudes change - composition of the court changes & the Court overturns its own precedents

Back

The Latin phrase used when the SCOTUS bases its decisions on precedents from similar cases

Front

stare decisis

Back

selection gridlock

Front

when nothing gets done in the government because the legislative and executive branches disagree

Back

U.S. v. Virginia (lower court conflicting ruling)

Front

(all male Virginia Military Institute policy of not admitting women was challenged)

Back

The Burger Court

Front

The Burger Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1969 to 1986, when Warren Burger served as Chief Justice of the United States

Back

A man is arrested for selling narcotics. What type of law is involved?

Front

criminal law

Back

Shaw v. Hunt (cases w/ significance)

Front

(gerrymandering case holding that race should not be the sole factor in drawing district boundaries)

Back

What would you typically see in an appellate court?

Front

multiple judges; no jury

Back

The Warren Court

Front

the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States during which Earl Warren served as Chief Justice

Back

Amicus curiae briefs

Front

("an impartial advisory") briefs from individuals, interest groups, or government agencies that have an interest in the case & claim to have information vital to the decision

Back

The strongest type of Supreme Court opinion is a(n)

Front

unanimous opinion

Back

Supreme Court justices were given tenure subject to good behavior by the framers in order to...

Front

justices are free from direct political pressure

Back

U.S. vs Lanza

Front

SCOTUS held that dual sovereignty is not a violation of double jeopardy protections (as laid out in the 5th Amendment)

Back