Citizen X is suing his neighbor Y for ramming his $7,000 car. This case could be heard in..
Front
a state court
Back
judicial activism
Front
the belief that the Supreme Court justices should actively make policy and sometimes redefine the constitution
Back
Judiciary Act of 1787
Front
established lower federal courts
Back
original jurisdiction
Front
Trial court where a case is originally tried
Back
stare decisis
Front
"let the decision stand"; an informal rule of judicial policy based on precedents;the practice of basing legal decisions on established Supreme Court percents from similar cases
Back
Who influences the President's selection of judiciary appointees?
Front
Congress, The American Bar Association, and sitting judges
Back
Court of Veterans Appeals
Front
Congress set up this court to hear veterans' war claims for benefits & other veterans' problems
Back
Court of Appeals
Front
hears cases from all across the nation from the legislative courts and from district courts on certain cases, such as those involving patents, trademarks, or copyrights
Back
appellate jurisdiction
Front
The trial court that hears a case being appealed. If a person loses an appeal they may appeal to SCOTUS
Back
majority opinion
Front
most senior member of the majority decides who writes this opinion & will do so in consultation w/ other justices
Back
US Tax Court
Front
All civil cases involving taxes are heard in Tax Court. Most cases come from IRS & Treasury
Back
exclusive jurisdiction
Front
The authority of the federal courts alone to hear and rule in certain cases; cases involving a federal or foreign government official and cases that arises out of an act of Congress
Back
district courts
Front
courts of original jurisdiction - hearing both criminal & civil cases & their jurisdiction extends to most cases heard in fed. courts
Back
What are the justices duties?
Front
-deciding which cases to hear
- explaining the decision (writing Court's opinion(s))
- dealing with requests for special legal actions that come from various courts/circuits
- taking occasional additional duties like serving on special commissions
Back
Plaintiff
Front
Person bringing charges in civil suit/trial.
Back
Courts of the District of Columbia
Front
Federal district court; court of appeals & local courts to hear civil & criminal cases
Back
dual sovereignty
Front
state and federal authorities can prosecute individuals for the same crime
Back
Defendant
Front
Person who must defend against the complaint
Back
Loose Constructionist
Front
a person who believes that the national government could claim broad powers only implied in the constitution
Back
Court of military appeals
Front
Hears cases brought from military courts by members of the armed forces convicted of breaking military law
Back
constitutional court
Front
a federal court with constitutionally based powers and whose judges serve for life.
Back
Grand Jury
Front
people who hear charges against a person suspected of committing a crime. They then evaluate if there is enough evidence against a person to order him or her to stand trial
Back
criminal law
Front
defines crimes against the public order and provides for punishment
Back
civil law
Front
law that govern the relations between individuals and defines their legal rights
Back
Legislative Court
Front
a specialized court established to hear cases about and execute the legislative powers of congress
Back
Who establishes inferior federal courts?
Front
Congress
Back
Precedents
Front
a judicial decision that is used as a standard in later similar cases; the custom of settling a court case in accordance with earlier decisions on similar cases
Back
Constitutional law
Front
when federal courts determine cases based on how each judge interprets the Constitution
Back
judicial restraint
Front
the belief that the Supreme Court justices should not actively try to shape social and political issues or redefine the Constitution
Back
Writ of mandamus
Front
a court order which forces a government official to take a particular action
Back
Petit jury
Front
a trial jury, usually consisting of 6-12 people, who weigh evidence presented at a trial
Back
Jurisdiction
Front
the right to interpret and apply the law; a court's range of authority. In essence the restrictions on the kinds of cases a court may hear
Back
How many judges are on the Supreme Court?
Front
9
Back
Equality law
Front
principle which resolves the dispute on grounds of fairness
Back
Most cases come to the Supreme Court as a result of what?
Front
Writs of certiorari
Back
Which court was directly established by the Constitution?
Front
The Supreme Court
Back
Who appoints all federal judges?
Front
The President
Back
Court of international trade
Front
Court hears civil cases related to taxes & trade and is based in NYC but also hears cases from NOLA & San Fran
Back
Territorial Courts
Front
Constitution gives Congress power to make rules to govern US territories so Congress created court system to handle civil, criminal and constitutional cases
Back
Who confirms the federal judges?
Front
The Senate
Back
What are the chief justice's duties?
Front
- Presiding over sessions & conferences
- He typically writes the majority opinion if he agrees w/ majority.
- Supervises the general admin. of the fed. court system
Back
A person who favors a narrow view of the Constitution is called a
Front
strict constructionist
Back
strict constructionist
Front
a person who believes that the national government should exercise only the powers specifically mentioned in the constitution
Back
U.S. Claims Court
Front
hear claims about monetary damages
Back
Judicial Review
Front
the power (by SCOTUS) to determine if the laws are constitutional or unconstitutional
Back
dissenting opinion
Front
most senior member of the losing side decides who writes the opinion
Back
senatorial courtesy
Front
the practice in which a presidential nomination is submitted initially for approval to the senators from the nominee's state
Back
writ of certiorari
Front
"made more certain"; an order from a higher court requiring a lower court to send the record of cases for review
Back
concurrent jurisdiction
Front
the authority to hear cases shared by federal and state courts; cases involve citizens of different states
Back
concurring opinion
Front
1 or more justices who agree with the Court's decision for different reasons or who want to emphasize a point not made in the majority's opinion
Back
Section 2
(23 cards)
Amicus curiae briefs amount to a form of
Front
judicial lobbying
Back
"Rule of Four"
Front
a petition is heard if a minimum of 4 justices vote to accept the case (each justice voted aloud, one a time, starting w/ the chief and then according to seniority)
Back
Koon v. US (legal question)
Front
(California appeals court disagreed w/trial court's sentence of Rodney King police officer - SCOTUS sent it back to California courts for reconsideration)
Back
Marbury v. Madison
Front
That judge (William Marbury) asked SCOTUS for a writ of mandamus - a court order which forces a government official to take a particular action
Back
The most important factors influencing POTUS's selection of judges & justices appears to be
Front
ideology and partisanship
Back
SCOTUS uses the 14th amendment to apply portions of the Bill of Rights to state law by citing
Front
due process of law
Back
A kid is running away from one state into another state. This is which type of jurisdicition?
Front
concurrent jurisdiction
Back
A case on appeal reaches the Supreme Court via a writ of
Front
certiorari
Back
Issues with implementation
Front
- Public (sometimes) responds quickly
- Other times implementation of a court's decision can take years or months
Back
Marbury vs. Madison, SCOTUS assumed the power to
Front
decide on the constitutionality of a law or an exec. action
Back
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
Front
- Two children were expelled for not saluting the American flag at school due to being Jehovah's Witnesses. Result: SC ruled that the salute does not infringe on liberties protected by the 1st and 14th. National unity. - in the state's interest
- Precedent gives continuity and stability to the meaning of law & sets standard for measurement of justice.
-Times & attitudes change - composition of the court changes & the Court overturns its own precedents
Back
The Latin phrase used when the SCOTUS bases its decisions on precedents from similar cases
Front
stare decisis
Back
selection gridlock
Front
when nothing gets done in the government because the legislative and executive branches disagree
Back
U.S. v. Virginia (lower court conflicting ruling)
Front
(all male Virginia Military Institute policy of not admitting women was challenged)
Back
The Burger Court
Front
The Burger Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1969 to 1986, when Warren Burger served as Chief Justice of the United States
Back
A man is arrested for selling narcotics. What type of law is involved?
Front
criminal law
Back
Shaw v. Hunt (cases w/ significance)
Front
(gerrymandering case holding that race should not be the sole factor in drawing district boundaries)
Back
What would you typically see in an appellate court?
Front
multiple judges; no jury
Back
The Warren Court
Front
the period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States during which Earl Warren served as Chief Justice
Back
Amicus curiae briefs
Front
("an impartial advisory") briefs from individuals, interest groups, or government agencies that have an interest in the case & claim to have information vital to the decision
Back
The strongest type of Supreme Court opinion is a(n)
Front
unanimous opinion
Back
Supreme Court justices were given tenure subject to good behavior by the framers in order to...
Front
justices are free from direct political pressure
Back
U.S. vs Lanza
Front
SCOTUS held that dual sovereignty is not a violation of double jeopardy protections (as laid out in the 5th Amendment)