Section 1

Preview this deck

Federalism Disadvantages

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

7 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (144)

Section 1

(50 cards)

Federalism Disadvantages

Front

¨ Can be inefficient because it requires cooperation between national and state governments ¨ difficulties when actions in one state cause problems in neighboring states ¨ not all citizens are treated the same. Some have access to better education, tuition, highway, medical.

Back

Powers of government under the Articles of Confederation

Front

o Power to borrow and coin money o Power to declare war o Power to make treaties and alliances with other nations o Power to regulate trade with the Native Americans o Power to settle disputes among other states

Back

Amount of justices currentily serving on the supreme court

Front

9

Back

Loose Interpretation

Front

▪ Based on the idea that the constitution gives the government the power to undertake various activities ▪ Ways that these goals are achieved can include many different methods ▪ Some advocate that the judicial activism based on loose interpretation of the constitution should be the role of the judiciary

Back

Inherent Powers

Front

power that must be assumed to exist as a direct result of the country's existence

Back

Judicial Powers

Front

▪ National courts to deal with national laws ▪ Judicial review- permits them to overturn laws passed by Congress and actions of the president or others in the executive branch that conflict with the constitution

Back

Executive Orders

Front

Formal orders issued by the president to direct action by the federal bureaucracy.

Back

Expressed Powers

Front

▪ These powers define jurisdictional boundaries within which the federal government has authority ▪ Ex: coin money, regulate interstate and foreign trade, raise and maintain armed forces, declare war, govern US territories, conduct foreign relations

Back

Executive Powers

Front

▪ Faithfully execute laws of the land ▪ Vice president become president if president dies ▪ Vice president is presiding officer of the senate- gets to vote to break a tie ▪ President is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and chief diplomate. He is responsible for the foreign affairs of the country

Back

Leadership in the Senate

Front

Vice president is the President of the senate President pro tempore is selcted by vice Then majority leader, minority leader, majority whip, andminority whip

Back

New Jersey Plan

Front

unicameral legislature (sttes have the same representation regardless of population) Each state equal representation Big States opposed

Back

McCulloch v Maryland

Front

o Broadened the interpretation of the constitution to permit congress to do more rather than less o Their decision relied on the broad interpretation of the necessary and proper clause in Article I (creation of a national bank. Maryland lacked the power to tax the bank)

Back

Civil Court Cases

Front

▪ Involve two or more private (non-government) parties, at least one alleges harm or injury committed by the other

Back

Enumerated Powers

Front

The powers explicitly given to Congress in the Constitution.

Back

separation of powers

Front

Constitutional division of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, with the legislative branch making law, the executive applying and enforcing the law, and the judiciary interpreting the law

Back

Redistricting

Front

o If a state gains or loses House seats, it must redraw its district lines to accommodate the change

Back

Weaknesses of the articles of confederation

Front

national government lacked the power to raise an arumy (no national army) no power to impose and collect taxes Didn't possess power to regualte trade among different states

Back

Criminal court Cases

Front

▪ Governments establish rules and punishments for crimes committed

Back

Reasons against ratifying the Constitution

Front

▪ People didn't want to increase the powers of the national government at the expense of the states ▪ Didn't guarantee protection of individual liberties

Back

Checks and balances

Front

A system that allows each branch of government to limit the powers of the other branches in order to prevent abuse of power

Back

Bill become law

Front

o Bill is introduced and given to the appropriate standing committee o Bill is sent to the Rules Committee o Bill is debated in the House and Senate with the possibility of a filibuster in the Senate o Bill is voted upon by the House and Senate o Bill is sent to the conference committee to form one unified bill o Unified bill is sent back to the House and Senate to be voted on o Bill goes to the present for signature or veto. If Vetoed, Congress has ability to override veto

Back

Contributors to social contract theory

Front

o Thomas Hobbes- society isn't something natural and immutable, it is created by us. War of all against all. Physical Security. o Rousseau- World starts as good but population increases so do the inequalities, making it unstable. Freedom of choice. o Locke- The world is a relatively decent place where people are rational and mindful of the law. Quality of life.

Back

Marbury v Madison

Front

o This case clearly set the pattern of the judicial review o If they ruled against Marbury, the Court would appear to be giving in to the executive branch, if they ruled in favor of Marbury, the court had no way of forcing Jefferson and Madison to deliver the papers which would make them appear weak. The Court decided that Marbury was entitled to his appointment papers and that he had followed the prescribed legal procedures. The court avoided looking weak with their decision and very clearly established the principle of judicial review (judicial review means that the supreme court has the ultimate authority in ruling on constitutional matters)

Back

Legislative

Front

Congress (House of Representatives and the Senate)

Back

Jurisdiction of State courts

Front

▪ Hear day-to-day cases ▪ Civil and criminal ▪ Help states retain their won sovereignty in judicial matters over their state laws

Back

Impeachment Process

Front

1. House passes articles of impeachment by majority 2. Senate tries and 2/3 must convict

Back

Virginia Plan

Front

Bicameral legislature with two chamers with represntaiton based on population representation in proportion to size of population small states opposed

Back

Judicial activism

Front

An interpretation of the U.S. constitution holding that the spirit of the times and the needs of the nation can legitimately influence judicial decisions (particularly decisions of the Supreme Court) loose interpretation

Back

Federalism Advantages

Front

o Ability of individual states to innovate in ways that they deal with problems o Government can pass a basic program for the country and states can add to it o Power is divided o Opportunity for individuals to participate more in the political system

Back

Key elements of social contract theory

Front

state of nature, natural rights, sovereignty, consensual political rule

Back

Gerrymandering

Front

Process of redrawing legislative boundaries for the purpose of benefiting the party in power.

Back

Federalist #51

Front

o Purpose ▪ A way to erase the fears of national government under the constitution would become too powerful and lead to a tyrannical government that would abuse its power and people ▪ Explain how the mechanisms of check and balances and separation of powers would prevent national government from abusing its increased power o Arguments ▪ Increasing the powers of the national government would not lea to an automatic abuse of power due to separation of powers and check and balances

Back

Appellate Jurisdiction

Front

▪ A court hears a case on appeal from a lower court and may change the lower court's decision ▪ For the most part, the Supreme Court is an appeals court, so it operated under this and hears appeals from the lower courts

Back

Ant-Federalist's views

Front

o Where are our liberties o Rural America, the south o Want to amend the articles of confederation o Feared power of national government o State legislatures could better protect freedoms o Power should be with the small, landowning farmers of average wealth

Back

Legislative Powers

Front

▪ Making Laws ▪ Deal with international trade and commerce between states ▪ Declare war on foreign countries ▪ Potential role in the selection of president if no majority votes

Back

Sturcture of government under the articles of confereration

Front

o Limit power of national government. Greater state sovereignty. Limited power of national government too much, too weak to function. Didn't have multiple branches.

Back

Implied Powers

Front

▪ Powers used by the national government that are not expressly written in the Constitution but that are assumed through interpretation ▪ Use an elastic clause which enables Congress to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying out its constitutional responsibilities ▪ Belong solely to the national government

Back

Federalist #10

Front

o Purpose: ▪ Address the fears of the Anti-Federalists who were suspicious of a government run by elites ▪ To inform the states that factions could be contained by a representative government ▪ To get more states to support ratification of the Constitution o Arguments ▪ No need to fear the power of factions because the diversity that existed in the country was so large that it would not allow for the development of large political interest groups ▪ Having a representative government would be the best way to control against the detrimental effects of factions. ▪ Having a representative form of government would allow the people to elect those of the highest minds to make decisions

Back

Miller v Johnson

Front

o Racial gerrymandering went before the court. Race can't be the dominant and controlling motivation for drawing congressional districts

Back

Strict Interpretation

Front

Stick to literal word meaning of the Constitution

Back

Original Jurisdiction

Front

The jurisdiction of courts that hear a case first, usually in a trial. These are the courts that determine the facts about a case.

Back

Federalist's views

Front

o Need large republic with strong central government o States have elections and senate o Supported the new constitution o Represented by the wealthy and elite o National defense and economic growth

Back

Three Fifths Compromise

Front

o Slave-holding states were allowed to count all their free population, including free African Americans, plus 60% (three-fifths) of their enslaved population. The North counted 60% of state's slave population for federal taxation.

Back

Leadership in the House of Representatives

Front

Every 2 years Select the Speaker of the House Then Majority Leader Then Minority Leader Then Majority and Minority whip

Back

Goals of the articles of confederation

Front

Limit the powers of the national government. Great state sovereignty

Back

Stare decisis

Front

o Let the decision stand o Judge is indicating that they are relying on the established principles and are often not willing to change them o A judge in a 2001 case rules unconstitutional a law that unduly limits a woman's access to abortion

Back

Reapportionment

Front

o the number of house seats is permanently fixed at 435. After a federal census, each state stands to gain or lose house seats because of population changes. Congress then reallocates the number of House seats to which each state is entitles.

Back

Great Compromise

Front

o between the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. Decided that it would be a bicameral legislature consisting of 2 chambers: Senate and House of Representatives. Each state has two senators regardless of size (New Jersey Plan). Representation in the house would be based on population (Virginia Plan)

Back

Federalism

Front

A system in which power is divided between the national and state governments

Back

Reasons for ratifying the Constitution

Front

▪ National defense ▪ Economic growth ▪ Trade ▪ tariffs

Back

Section 2

(50 cards)

Civil Liberties

Front

o if the government is supposed to leave you alone, then it's a liberty ex: speaking about government policy, exercise, religion

Back

Habeas Corpus

Front

Constitutional protection against unlawful imprisonment

Back

Concurrent Powers

Front

▪ Ex: federal and state levels can tax income, borrowing, making and enforcing laws ▪ Powers where both the national government and state government share authority

Back

House number of Members

Front

▪ number of representatives per state is proportional to a state's population 435

Back

4th amendment

Front

Freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures

Back

Rights of the accused

Front

¨ No quartering of soldiers without consent ¨ No searches or seizures without a warrant based on probably cause ¨ Indictment by grand jury ¨ No double jeopardy ¨ No self-incrimination ¨ Speedy and public trial ¨ Informed of the accusation ¨ Right to a lawyer ¨ Excessive bail prohibited ¨ No cruel and unusual punishment

Back

Citizens United v Federal Election Commission

Front

A 2010 landmark Supreme Court case that ruled that individuals, corporations, and unions could donate unlimited amounts of money to groups that make independent political expenditures. o There is no limit to how much money unions or corporations can donate to super PACs.

Back

President nominated and elected

Front

o File to run with state and national government o Create and manage 50 separate state organizations o Nominated at national party conventions o Start at state-level and compete against other candidates and win over a majority of the delegates o Your popular vote total determines the number of a state's national party delegates you'll get

Back

5th amendment

Front

The Right to Remain Silent/Double Jeopardy, right to due process

Back

Senate number of members

Front

100 (2 per state)

Back

Reserved Powers

Front

▪ 10th amendment was added to the constitution within the Bill of Rights stating the notion of states' rights providing the states reserved powers ▪ Reserved powers belong solely to the states ▪ The powers not delegated to the US by the constitution are reserved to the states or people ▪ Ex: each state has their own health rules, safety rules, marriage and divorce laws

Back

13th amendment

Front

abolished slavery

Back

Jurisdiction of federal Courts

Front

▪ Hear cases that involve a "federal question", involving the constitution, federal laws or treaties, or a federal party ▪ Hear both civil and criminal matters ▪ Hear cases that involve "interstate" matters, diversity of citizenship, or between US citizen and a citizen of another nation

Back

19th amendment

Front

Gave women the right to vote

Back

No ex post facto laws

Front

laws applied to acts committed before the laws' passage are unconstitutional

Back

how the electoral college works

Front

o Each state gets a certain number of electors based on its total number of representatives in Congress. Each elector casts one electoral vote following the general election There are a total of 538 electoral votes. The candidate that gets more than half (270) wins

Back

House nonminated and elected

Front

o Nominated in primary election and receive a plurality of the popular vote to win the primary election o Move onto general election and get a plurality of votes

Back

14th amendment

Front

Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and are guaranteed equal protection of the laws o granted citizenship and equal civil and legal rights to African Americans and slaves who had been emancipated after the Civil War

Back

Privileges and Immunities Clause

Front

▪ States are prohibited from discriminating against out-of-state residents by denying them such guarantees as access to courts, property rights, and travel rights

Back

Public Interest groups

Front

o promote public or collective goods. Promote interest for the collective or the greater good Ex: public safety

Back

Hard Money

Front

o contributed directly to a candidate which is heavily regulated and limited

Back

Sot Money

Front

o raised for purposes like party-building efforts, get-out-the-vote efforts, and issue advocacy ads.

Back

Treason

Front

Betrayal of one's country

Back

Private Interest groups

Front

seek particularized benefits from the government that favor either a single interest or a narrow set of interests. Ex: corporate tax breaks

Back

Incumbents

Front

Those already holding office. In congressional elections, incumbents usually win.

Back

Inside Lobbying

Front

Direct communication between organized interests and policymakers, which is based on the assumed value of close ("inside") contacts with policymakers.

Back

No bills of attainder

Front

you cannot be punished without a trial

Back

House Term length

Front

2 years

Back

Rational Basis test

Front

A standard developed by the courts to test the constitutionality of a law; when applied, a law is constitutional as long as it meets a reasonable government interest. ex: not allowing blind people to drive for public safety

Back

Strict Scrutiny

Front

A Supreme Court test to see if a law denies equal protection because it does not serve a compelling state interest and is not narrowly tailored to achieve that goal ▪ When fundamental freedoms or suspected classes are the targets of discrimination ▪ Burden of proof rests on the government ex: brown v Board

Back

Outside Lobbying

Front

A form of lobbying in which an interest group seeks to use public pressure as a means of influencing officials. ex: press release

Back

Discimination

Front

an unjustified negative or harmful action toward a member of a group simply because the person belongs to that group

Back

24th amendment

Front

Abolishes poll taxes

Back

PACs

Front

Political Action Committees, raise money for candidates &/or parties

Back

Full Faith and credit Clause

Front

Constitution's requirement that each state accept the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state ex: driverse license valid in all states

Back

Brandenburg V Ohio

Front

1969--Determined that a law that proscribes advocacy of violence for political reform is constitutional if applied to speech that is not directed toward producing imminent lawlessness and is not likely to produce such action is not constitutional. Government can't punish speech

Back

three levels of scrutiny

Front

Rational Basis Test Intermediate Scrutiny Strict scruitiny

Back

26th amendment

Front

Lowered the voting age from 21 to 18

Back

Intermediate Scrutiny

Front

a test used by the Supreme Court in gender discrimination cases that places the burden of proof partially on the government and partially on the challengers to show that the law in question is unconstitutional ex: gender as the basis for discrimination

Back

15th amendment

Front

Citizens cannot be denied the right to vote because of race, color , or precious condition of servitude

Back

House of Representatives eligibility

Front

US citizen for at least 7 years and at least 25 years old

Back

Interest groups

Front

Groups of people who work together for similar interests or goals attempt to influence goernment decision-making

Back

Senate Eligibility

Front

US citizen for at least 9 years and at least 30 years old

Back

Super PACs

Front

political action committees established to make independent expenditures o can't directly donate to campaigns BUT can fund advertising focused on a federal candidate—can't be connected to a candidate, campaign, or specific party

Back

Win the general election

Front

o Win the electoral college by gaining 270 votes. Each state's delegates vote for the candidate that gets the most votes in their state or area.

Back

Civil Rights

Front

o The basic right to be free from unequal treatment based on certain protected characteristics (race, gender, disability) is such settings as employment, education, housing, and access to public facilities o if the government is supposed to be doing something, then it is a right ex: vote and receiving assistance

Back

Senate nominated and elected

Front

They are now elected by popular vote following the ratification of the 17th amendment

Back

Senate Term length

Front

6 years

Back

Gibbons v Ogden

Front

Regulating interstate commerce is a power reserved to the federal government

Back

Civil liberties

Front

Constitutional freedoms guaranteed to all citizens o An expression of the social contract and are protected under the Constitution

Back

Section 3

(44 cards)

equal Protection clause

Front

14th amendment clause that prohibits states from denying equal protection under the law, and has been used to combat discrimination

Back

7th amendment

Front

Right to jury in civil trials.

Back

Miler v California

Front

o Outcome: upheld the prosecution of a California publisher for the distribution of obscene materials o Significance: Miller Standard, the test used to determine whether expressive materials cross the line into unprotected obscenity

Back

Lemon v Kurtzman

Front

o Outcome: government involvement in religious practices is allowed when that involvement neither advances or inhibits religious practice o Significance: Lemon test sets criteria for assessing legislation concerning religion (law can't lead to excessive government entanglement with religion, law can't inhibit or advance religious practice, law must have some secular purpose)

Back

Priming

Front

o when media coverage predisposes the viewer or reader to a particular perspective on a subject or issue. Ex: newspaper article focusses on unemployment, struggling industries, and jobs moving overseas, the reader will have a negative opinion about the economy

Back

Framing

Front

o creation of a narrative or context for a news story ex: giving a brief overview of what happened before what is being talked about

Back

Voting Rights Act of 1965

Front

a law designed to help end formal and informal barriers to African-American suffrage literacy and understanding tests and other devised used to discriminate against voters on the basis of race were banned.

Back

Establishment Clause

Front

Clause in the First Amendment that says the government may not establish an official religion.

Back

Plessy v Ferguson

Front

o Outcome: allowed for separation based on race in public facilities "separate but equal" o Significance: limited what people of color could do and where and how they could travel. Segregation wasn't a violation of the 14th amendment. Allowed states to regulate what people of color could do in public spaces and how they could get there.

Back

Obergefell v Hodges

Front

o Required all states to issue marriage licenses and to recognize all valid same-sex marriages as legal under the 5th amendment and the Equal Protection Clause

Back

cultivation theory

Front

o : media develop a person's view of the world by presenting a perceived reality

Back

Cohen v California

Front

o Outcome: first amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "F the Draft" in public corridors of a California courthouse Significance: freedom of speech and expression gained protection

Back

Equal Time rule

Front

An FCC rule that if a broadcaster sells time to one candidate, it must sell equal time to other candidates.

Back

2nd Amendment

Front

Right to bear arms

Back

Oregon HR v Smith

Front

o Outcome: two individuals were not required to receive unemployment benefits since they were fired for work-related reasons o Significance: Businesses whose wonders or organizers may share a religious belief while the organization has a secular, nonreligious purpose is problematic

Back

United States v Windor

Front

o DOMA ruled unconstitutional under Due Process guarantees of the 5th amendment

Back

Gillette v United States

Front

o Outcome: Individuals had to object to service in all wars not just a particular war o Significance: conscientious objectors claim the right to refuse to perform military service on the grounds of freedom of thought, conscience, or religion

Back

Burwell v Hobby Lobby

Front

o Outcome: In favor of Hobby Lobby HHS contraception mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion o Significance: should owners in companies be required to provide free contraception if they have religious objections

Back

Hypodermic theory

Front

the idea that information is placed in a citizen's brain and accepted

Back

Minimal effects theory

Front

the idea that the media have little effect on citizens

Back

Texas v Johnson

Front

o Outcome: burning of the US flag was a constitutionally protected form of speech o Significance: this received a lot of criticism but it is freedom of expression

Back

horse race journalism

Front

o The media calls out every candidate's moves throughout the presidential campaign. It can be neutral, positive, or negative. Ex: Romney and Obama received more negative than positive horse-race journalism, Romney grew more negative

Back

Political socialization process

Front

o Process by which we are trained to understand and join a country's political world, and it starts when we are very young

Back

Free Exercise Clause

Front

A First Amendment provision that prohibits government from interfering with the practice of religion.

Back

bandwagon effect

Front

o The media pays more attention to candidates who poll well during the fall and in the first few primaries, which usually leads to a shift in support of those candidates by the electorate ex: Bill Clinton go second in primaries but then got media attention which get him through the primaries and became president

Back

Tinker v Des Moines

Front

o Outcome: in response to students wearing black armbands to school, neither students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate. School officials can't prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning o Significance: students in high school received increased rights as a result

Back

Brown v Board of Education

Front

o Outcome: separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. o Significance: signaled the end of legalized racial segregation in the schools of the US. Overruled the "separate but equal" principle in Plessy v. Ferguson

Back

6th amendment

Front

The right to a Speedy Trial by jury, representation by an attorney for an accused person

Back

Heuristics

Front

shortcuts to decision making ex: voting by party

Back

3rd amendment

Front

No quartering of soldiers during peace ▪ Soldiers can't be quartet in your home during war except as prescribed by law

Back

Sunshine law

Front

a law prohibiting public officials from holding meetings not open to the public

Back

Public opinion

Front

o Desires, wants, and thinking of the majority of the people. The collective opinion of the people of a society or state on an issue or problem

Back

womens suffrage

Front

the right of women to vote

Back

Roe v Wade

Front

o Outcome: state law that banned abortions was unconstitutional. o Significance: Abortion was made legal in many circumstances

Back

DOMA

Front

defined marriage as 1 man and 1 woman. Didn't recognize same-sex marriages

Back

Minersville School district v Gobitis

Front

o Outcome: supreme Court refused to support freedom of religion o Significance: JWs weren't given religious freedom because local laws (no solicitation for converts) needed to be upheld

Back

Jim Crow Laws

Front

Laws designed to enforce segregation of blacks from whites

Back

Sherbert v Verner

Front

o Outcome: government can restrict the free exercise rights of individuals only if the regulations survive strict scrutiny, placing a steep burden on state laws o Significance: Sherbert test (show there was a good reason for the law and that the law was the only feasible way of achieving that goal)

Back

Civil Rights Act of 1964

Front

outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin

Back

Pack journalism

Front

A method of news gathering in which news reporters all follow the same story in the same way because they read each other's copy for validation of their own.

Back

Miller Standard

Front

the test used to determine whether expressive materials cross the line into unprotected obscenity ▪ whether the material appeals to negative attitudes as defined by community standards ▪ whether the average person would find that the work appeals to prurient interest ▪ whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way

Back

8th amendment

Front

No cruel or unusual punishment no excessive bail or fines

Back

West Virginia v Barnette

Front

o Outcome: compelling children in public schools to salute the flag was unconstitutional o Significance: Freedom of speech is important JWs needed that to proselyte and not salute the flag

Back

Public Relations

Front

o the professional maintenance of favorable public image by a company or other organization or a famous person

Back