1. Cayley's Copies used Bob's textbook for educational purposes. This would be for fair use by Cayley's copies.
2. Cayley's Copies published Bob's textbook, compiling up to 100 pages and roughly 30% of the book. The information is factual and is still available for purchase. Cayley's Copies, under these facts, would not be protected under the fair use act.
3. Cayley's Copies took a significant portion of Bob's book, therefore it's unprotected under the fair use doctrine.
4. The unlicensed use by Cayley's Copies does affect Bob. Cayley is selling the copies she used from Bob's book in her 200 stores throughout the country, therefore her use of Bob's book is not protected under the doctrine. Because Cayley's Copies' use of Bob's book isn't protected under the factors: nature of copyrighted work, portion of work used and economic effect, it was proclaimed that Cayley's Copies doesn't qualify for fair use under the Fair Use Doctrine.