Section 1

Preview this deck

enforcers of public interest, at the federal and state level

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (102)

Section 1

(50 cards)

enforcers of public interest, at the federal and state level

Front

government regulators

Back

Post- consideration

Front

some type of payment before the winner can claim the prize.

Back

Carbolic Smoke Ball Case

Front

There was a flu epidemic and no one knew how to prevent it. The makers of the "smoke ball" advertised an award of 100 Euros in the paper to any person who contracted the flu after using the ball 3X per day for two weeks. Courts used contract law to decide the case and the smoke ball company had to pay as promised.

Back

Puffer has 4 characteristics:

Front

1. It is general and vague 2. isn't measurable or verifiable 3. Presented as subjective 4. claim consumers are unlikely to rely on

Back

preliminary injunction (equitable remedy)

Front

prohibits the parties from doing an act until a pending ruling or outcome.

Back

False comparative claims

Front

Competitors often sue over comparative statements

Back

3 part regulatory structure for false advertising

Front

government regulators, competitors, consumers

Back

A contest eliminates the 2nd factor (chance)

Front

People pay to participate but there is no element of chance. Ex. a talent contest.

Back

Consumer protection laws

Front

UDAP statute - "Unfair& Deceptive Acts & Practices." 2"Little FTC" statutes- Private enforcement by consumer plaintiffs.

Back

TRO (equitable remedy)

Front

temporary restraining order

Back

permanent injunction (equitable remedy)

Front

with success at trial prohibits anymore acts

Back

Some familiar disclaimers:

Front

1. Dramatization 2. Shipping and handling not included 3. Subject to prior approval 4. No purchase necessary 5. If symptoms persist discontinue use and consult physician 6. Use only as directed 7. Void where prohibited by law 8. Offer good while supplies last 9. Offer valid at participating dealers only

Back

Common Law Claims

Front

Courts use contract law to fix a problem with false advertising law

Back

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

Front

can issue civil investigative demands to investigate potential deception or unfairness (consumer protectors)

Back

Disparagement advertising

Front

is permissible as long as it is truthful and not deceptive.

Back

Lanham Act 6 factor inquiry: to determine if plaintiff prevails

Front

1.false or misleading statement of fact 2.In interstate commerce (exchange between different states) 3.In connection with commercial advertising or promotion 4.deceive an appreciable # of consumers in the intended audience 5.That is material 6.That is likely to cause injury to the Plaintiff

Back

Enforcement proceeding

Front

respondent who violates an order may be sued in Federal District Court. Penalty is up to $11,000 per violation, along with injunctive relief and other equitable relief (either have to stop or do a specific behavior/act)

Back

Hard to find disclaimers

Front

evidence of an intent to deceive customers.

Back

Statement of opinion

Front

can't reasonably be seen as stating provable facts.

Back

Fair use doctrine will apply to Obama poster

Front

An artist stole AP's photo of Obama that was used during his campaign and turned it into his HOPE poster where he reaped the benefits of t shirts and stuff too. set up IRAQ for that (like cayley)

Back

Comparative Parity (equivalence) Claims

Front

claims that consumers think a product is "as good as" a competitor or that "nothing is more effective"

Back

Falsity by necessary implication

Front

courts may dispense with the requirement of extrinsic (outside and inadmissible) evidence if the misleadingness is obvious enough.

Back

Direct action

Front

When the FTC has reason to believe a person is violating or is about to violate a law they enforce. FTC can ask for an injunction (authoritative order) pending investigation.

Back

Comparative preference claims

Front

must be based on an adequate study or survey of the relevant market. Example: Ads claiming that VISA was the preferred lodging card found to be false because VISA's evidence showed only that consumers use VISA more NOT that they LIKE VISA more.

Back

Puffery

Front

talk that is so common that reasonable consumers are presumed to treat them as unverifiable, unquantifiable, subjective and unreliable. (Examples: best, finest, brightest, most delicious)

Back

Federal court litigation

Front

Two classes of cases: enforcement proceeding and direct action

Back

National Advertising Division

Front

NAD monitors advertising, accepts consumer complaints and engages in its own investigations, alternative to litigation. NAD can be cheaper and quicker than litigation in federal court.

Back

The default rule

Front

a disclaimer should be presented in the same space or time as the claim it modifies.

Back

competitors

Front

pursue their own interests against unfair competition

Back

monetary and Equitable remedies

Front

Both monetary and equitable remedies are available in Lanham Act cases

Back

consumers

Front

assert that they have been deceived or harmed by advertising. often in class actions (sue defendant as a group) based on state consumer protection law

Back

State attorney generals can:

Front

1. Enforce consumer protection laws on behalf of the public in most states. Cy Pres -when restitution (recompense for injury or loss) is given to relevant nonprofits when affected customers can't be readily identified

Back

A sweepstakes eliminates the 3rd factor (pay to play)

Front

It's a prize based on chance but people participate without payment.

Back

recall and destruction of advertising material

Front

in extraordinary cases

Back

The four P's - elements of a clear and conspicuous disclosure

Front

A. Prominence - big/loud enough for consumers to notice and read/hear B. Presentation - wording and format easy for consumers to understand C. Placement - place where consumers will look and/or conveyed in a way they will hear D. Proximity - Near the claim it qualifies

Back

Consideration

Front

can be any substantial expenditure of effort, such as taking a long survey or making multiple visits to a store. The more effort that is required the more likely it is to constitute consideration.

Back

Lanham Act

Front

Covers trademark and false advertising. Main law used by competitors.

Back

Literal falsity

Front

Literal false claims lead to liability w/o needing evidence of consumer deception unless no reasonable consumer would take them seriously.

Back

Determining the nature of the claim

Front

Claims that are not literally false but are potentially misleading, lead to liability (reliable by law) if there is evidence that they do deceive consumers

Back

Corrective advertising

Front

equitable remedy

Back

An Illegal lottery has 3 components:

Front

A. A prize - anything of tangible value B. Determined on the basis of chance C. paid to participate

Back

Duration and repetition

Front

Rule: disclaimers that are stated only once or twice while the underlying claim is repeated are ineffective. This rule is particularly applicable to lengthy ads such as websites or infomercials.

Back

Dominant factor test: Courts ask:

Front

A. is contest impossible to win without skill and can entrants make informed decisions B. does the average player have enough skill to participate. C. Whether skill determines the actual result of the game. D. are participants aware of the skill and criteria that will be used to determine the winner.

Back

Statement of fact

Front

a specific and measurable claim capable of being proven false or as an objective fact.

Back

Article III standing

Front

determinant over whether case is appropriate for access to federal court.

Back

FTC detailed suggestions for effective disclaimers

Front

Guidelines clearly written and prominent

Back

the court considers these four factors: fair use of copyright under Section 107 of the Fair Use Doctrine?

Front

1. Purpose and character of use 2. Nature of copyrighted work 3. Portion of work used (how much?) 4. Economic Effect

Back

Comparative Superiority Claims

Front

statements that consumers prefer a product or that it is more effective than its competitors. Can be proven false

Back

analyze the 4 factors

Front

1. Cayley's Copies used Bob's textbook for educational purposes. This would be for fair use by Cayley's copies. 2. Cayley's Copies published Bob's textbook, compiling up to 100 pages and roughly 30% of the book. The information is factual and is still available for purchase. Cayley's Copies, under these facts, would not be protected under the fair use act. 3. Cayley's Copies took a significant portion of Bob's book, therefore it's unprotected under the fair use doctrine. 4. The unlicensed use by Cayley's Copies does affect Bob. Cayley is selling the copies she used from Bob's book in her 200 stores throughout the country, therefore her use of Bob's book is not protected under the doctrine. Because Cayley's Copies' use of Bob's book isn't protected under the factors: nature of copyrighted work, portion of work used and economic effect, it was proclaimed that Cayley's Copies doesn't qualify for fair use under the Fair Use Doctrine.

Back

Attorney's fees

Front

in exceptional cases

Back

Section 2

(50 cards)

To qualify for a patent, an invention must meet three conditions:

Front

1. Utility: it muse be useful 2. Novelty: it must be new 3. Non-obvious: it cannot be a reworking of an existing invention in such a way that anyone else could duplicate it.

Back

Distinctiveness

Front

Required for a valid trademark, the more distinctive the mark, the greater its potential scope of protection

Back

TRIPS - Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property

Front

contains specific protection clauses for computer software and other forms of electronic copyright.

Back

three music licenses:

Front

synchronization license, master use license, performance license

Back

Equal opportunities rule: Sect. 315 of the Communications Act

Front

whenever a legally qualified candidate for public office uses broadcast time, the station must afford equal opp. to all other candidates in the race.

Back

Doctrine of work-made-for-hire: 2 exceptions under this doctrine: (employer owns work, not employee)

Front

A. When the work is made during the regular course of employment B. When the work is contracted to be made

Back

Infringement of Owner's rights:

Front

Registration with the Copyright Office is required before a plaintiff can sue for copyright infringement Even if not registered the work should contain the copyright notice

Back

The registration symbol (R) puts others on notice of a claim of ownership

Front

If the trademark symbol is not registered the owner may use the TM or SM symbol. Registration of a trademark lasts 10 years but can be renewed indefinitely.

Back

Copyright owners exclusive rights:

Front

1. right to control reproduction 2. right to control public performance 3. right to control derivative works

Back

Trademark rights can be lost through:

Front

abandonment, dilution or infringement

Back

Scenes a faire

Front

used when due to the genre of the work, certain elements would naturally be expected: Like a training segment in a sports film establishing a similarity or even copying these elements is not enough to establish copyright infringement

Back

copyright

Front

protects original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression whether they are published or unpublished.

Back

copyright owners have limited visual rights also known as moral rights

Front

these rights apply only to original works of art, sculpture and other works of visual arts that are produced in 200 copies or fewer. Visual rights were added to bring our. These rights give artists limited rights to prevent their works from being destroyed or defaced.

Back

Trademark

Front

any word, name, slogan, design or symbol that is used in commerce to identify a particular product and distinguish it from others.

Back

Copyright's general nondiscrimination principle:

Front

protects all original creative works without judging their merits. Includes ads and illegal works such as obscene material.

Back

Spectrum scarcity rationale

Front

primary justification for broadcast regulation.

Back

Master Use License

Front

required to use a particular sound recording in a particular work

Back

Blanket licenses

Front

broadcast stations pay a yearly fee to the organization based on gross receipts of the business.

Back

The FC considers three factors to determine whether a program qualifies as a bona fide news interview

Front

1. is it regularly scheduled 2. does the broadcaster, not the candidate control the program 3. the broadcaster's decisions on format and participants are based on reasonable journalistic judgment.

Back

Intellectual property:

Front

A. legal name for copyrights, trademarks and patents B. Protection is provided for in the US Constitution C. Congress is specifically given the power in the Constitution

Back

trademark

Front

Trademark law governs the use of brand names and other words or symbol associated with a product or service.

Back

Work for hire (3rd party work)

Front

where copyright law considers the commissioning party, the advertiser, the owner of the work. For non-employees, a work for hire, must be in writing and fit within one of the nine categories in the Copyright Act.

Back

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co

Front

a picture that is used for an ad can be the subject of a copyright

Back

Trespass on private property

Front

tort

Back

Implied consent

Front

when people routinely enter upon private property without specific authorization and without becoming liable for trespass. Ex. to shop, eat at a restaurant or knock on a front door.

Back

The Copyright Act gives the copyright owner the exclusive right to:

Front

a. reproduce the work b. prepare derivative works based on the work c. distribute copies or recordings of the work d. perform the work publicly e. display the work publicly

Back

The doctrine of merger

Front

applies to express an unprotectable idea; to keep the idea free for use, the expression can't be protected... used in courts when the plaintiff's copyright is "thin"

Back

WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organization

Front

An agency of the UN responsible for protecting and stimulating creativity around the world. Administers several multilateral treaties, the two main ones are: The Berne Convention and The Universal Copyright Convention.

Back

Hierarchy of distinctiveness:

Front

A. Fanciful marks: most distinctive - by themselves give no clue to the product like Exxon or Kodak B. Arbitrary marks: common words applied in a unique and arbitrary way - like Apple computers or Camel cigarettes C. Suggestive marks: terms that provide some clue to the products - like Orange Crush and Playboy Magazine. D. Descriptive terms: word that specifically describe characteristics of the product - like Surfing news for a newsletter about surfing E. Generic terms: common terms already in use - cannot be claimed as a trademark - like cat food or surfboard wax

Back

How to avoid an illegal lottery

Front

the advertiser must provide a 2nd entry method that doesn't require any consideration. This is typically called and Alternate Means of Entry. The chances of winning through the AMOE must be equal to the chances of winning through purchase.

Back

Performance rights societies

Front

handle licensing on behalf of music copyright owners.

Back

Abandonment

Front

use is discontinued with an intent not to resume

Back

Zapple doctrine

Front

extends the equal opportunities rule to the supporters of candidates. When a broadcaster sells or gives time to the supporters of one candidate, the supporters of the opponent are entitled to equal time on the air.

Back

Bona fide

Front

news coverage that is genuine and impartial and not used to advance the candidacy of a particular individual.

Back

Willful infringement

Front

when the defendant knew it was infringing the plaintiff's copyrights or recklessly disregarded that possibility.

Back

Synchronization License

Front

required to use a musical composition in a film or other new work

Back

Unfair competition

Front

tort primarily concerned with wrongful conduct by a commercial enterprise that results in business loss to another, ordinarily by the use of deceptive means to draw customers away from a competitor.

Back

Section 512- Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act

Front

1. Known informally as the Section 512 Safe Harbor 2. States that an ISP, including libraries and educational institutions shall not be liable for storing and transmitting infringing material, posted by others on the ISP's site 3. Immunity applies: as long as the ISP is "passive," the transmission or storage is an automatic process and the ISP did not specifically select the work for display 5. Notice and Take Down Process: In order to qualify for safe harbor, ISPs must: maintain an effective system by which copyright owners can notify the ISP of an alleged infringement and a process to promptly investigate allegations remove the unauthorized material if appropriate.

Back

First sale doctrine

Front

ownership of the copyright is distinct from ownership of the physical work itself. Once the owner of a copyright authorizes the release of lawfully made copies (ex. selling textbooks to the bookstore those copies may in turn be passed along to others by sale, rental or loan)

Back

Dilution

Front

mark is permitted to be used as a generic term; many people have infringed the trademark rights by using the mark resulting in a loss of distinctiveness and rights.

Back

Infringement

Front

when someone imitate a registered mark in connection with the sale or advertising without the owner's consent.

Back

Unfair competition protects titles

Front

copying a confusingly similar title may be enjoined (prohibited) under unfair competition law.

Back

treaty or trade agreement

Front

Legal mechanism which allows copyright owners to enforce their rights in a foreign country

Back

A statute of frauds

Front

requires copyrighted works to be in writing. Always get any copyright deals in writing

Back

Performance License

Front

required to publicly perform a composition, as by broadcasting a recording of a composition on the radio.

Back

Copyright does not protect ideas themselves only the expression of ideas.

Front

Protection of the expression of an idea or process begins as soon as the work is fixed in a tangible medium. Email, software and mobile apps are considered fixed for purposes of copyright.

Back

WTO: World Trade Organization: Significant voice in international copyright standards and dispute resolution.

Front

Significant voice in international copyright standards and dispute resolution. Administers TRIPS

Back

Duration of the protection

Front

copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus 70 years. (For works created after January 1, 1978. Works created before 1923 are now in the public domain)

Back

Express consent

Front

when you are granted specific authorization to enter property

Back

Consent: a complete defense to trespass

Front

Back

Section 3

(2 cards)

trespass

Front

the intentional or unauthorized entry upon property that is rightfully possessed by others.

Back

Press pass

Front

card that is a quick form of news media ID

Back