Go on. Explore!

lvl 0 • 0 xp

lvl 1

Home Market Decks Interests

Philosphers on midterm Haskell

memorize.ai (lvl 286)

(0)

7 cards

()

Section 1

Preview this deck

Hobbes

Front

1 / 7

Haskell

0.0

0 reviews

5			0
4			0
3			0
2			0
1			0

Active users

All-time users

Favorites

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (7)

Section 1

(7 cards)

Hobbes

Front

- monarch ( 1 ruler) - The world was chaotic and people were selfish without central authority - give up some liberty for security - priority was safety and protection

Back

Beccaria

Front

- Strong criminal justice system - no capital punishment -really harsh penalties for crimes so people were incentivized not to commit crime - Innocent until proven guilty - laws need to be clear and simple

Back

Locke

Front

- constitutional monarchy (King or queen who's power is limited by a constitution) - believes all men are created equally - you are entitled to your natural rights life liberty and property - believed in social contract but also believed the people had the right to over throw the government if their rights were being taken away

Back

Plato

Front

- Some are better fit to rule than others - leadership should be based upon merit and education - philosophers were kings

Back

Rausseau

Front

- direct democracy - doesn't believe in separation of powers because he believes people should be directly voting on laws - everyone must be devoted to their government in order for it to properly function - idea of men being free and naturally good but human nature is corrupted by society

Back

Montesquieu

Front

- separation of powers - there must be a balance of powers no one brand has more power than the others

Back

Volraire

Front

- separation of church and state - doesn't trust the masses but also doesn't want to give the church or gov power so he likes representatives - supports representatives to construct and make laws for the people - individual rights

Back