Section 1

Preview this deck

CH7 Haddow Statutory Authority

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

1

All-time users

1

Favorites

0

Last updated

1 year ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (10)

Section 1

(10 cards)

CH7 Haddow Statutory Authority

Front

1- legal basis of modern EM in US 2-Budget Authority 3-Program eligibility 4- Roles and responsibilities 5-Case Studies: 6-National earthquake hazard reduction program (NEHRP) 7-Homeland security act 2002 8- Disaster Mitigation act 2000

Back

CH 1 DM in US Sylves Book

Front

1- Montecito, CAL Disaster: caused by burned ground of big wildfire and heavy rain fall 2- Montecito may knew about the hazards but were not warned to to evacuate when 3- rich neighborhoods could have disasters as well 4- blame the victim 5- is the discipline and profession of applying science, technology, planning, and management to deal with extreme events that can injure or kill great numbers of people, do extensive property damage, and disrupt community life. 6- Emergency Manager is someone who has the day-to-day responsibility for EM program activities 7 EMgrs distribute resources to mitigate (lesson the effect or prevent) hazards, and they prepare for, respond to and recovery from the effects of all types of hazards 8 EM require multidisciplinary and cross-disciplinary approaches 9-Certifications: PDS, Advanced Professional Series (APS, CEM and AEM 10- EM challenges: issue salience of disasters, fragementation of overment responsbilities for disasters, difficult of local government to address disasters, disaster insurance Who has Jurisdictions of EM: highly political, bureaucratic, infighting, profession rivalries Decentralization of decision making with sound coordination, is how EM is defined currently

Back

Theory in EM, ch 2 Sylves

Front

1- Jeffersonian: professionalizing EM 2- Hamiltonian: Expertise in EM, knowledge is a must 3- Jacksonian demand highly political , state and local participation an demands highly politically responsive EM 4-Bureaucratic policies an administrative culture permeate EM and disaster policy in USA intergovernmental relations theory 5-Principal agent theory 6-Network theory 7- Public Management Theory

Back

Presidential declarations of Major Disaster or emergency - ch 4 sylves book

Front

1- constitution grants president power in times of catastrophic disaster or national emergency 2- policies, process, programs, power, politics, paying

Back

Stakeholders in Disaster Policy

Front

1- local, state, federal agencies, 2- citizens 3- media 4- business and corporations 5- university research institutions 6- NGO 7- Contractors 8- Associations and collaborative partnerships

Back

NIMS Components

Front

NIMS is much more than just using the Incident Command System or an organization chart. NIMS is a consistent, nationwide, systematic approach that includes the following components: Preparedness Communications and Information Management Resource Management Command and Management Ongoing Management and Maintenance

Back

Science informs the policy and politics of disasters

Front

1- preparedness involve anticipating and developing variety of resources for response and recovery ,technology, warning systems, tactical planning 2- Fire services, research, science and technology 3- Medical sciences and disasters 4-flood recovery research 5-policy and politics of earthquake research and engineering 6- policy and politics of Tornado research 7- Public Infrastructure policy 8-Science and engineering have helped grow the professionally the field of EM

Back

NIMS 14 Characteristics

Front

1-common terminology 2-modular organization 3-management by objectives 4-IAP 5-Manageable Span of Control 6-Incident facilities 7-comprehensive resource management 8-Integrated comms establishment and transfer of command 10 unified command 11-chain of command and unity of command 12-accountability 13- dispatch / deployment 14- information and intelligence management

Back

Intro to crisis, disaster, risk concepts

Front

1- discipline dealing with risk and risk avoidance. 2- EM essential role of government for public health and safety 3- 1803 congressional act passed to provide assistance to New Hmasmpshire fire 4- 1934 Flood control act 5- 1950s cold war created the Federal Civil Defense Act (FCDA) 6- 1960s shift to natural hazards approach beside war/terrorisim 7-1970 National focus on EM 8- 1980 Civil Defense Reappear as nuclear attack planning 9- 1982 FEMA created, Louis O. Guiffrida first Director (nuclear attack planning) 10-1990 All hazard approach - James Lee Witt FEMA director 11- 2001 Terrorism focus - Joe Allbaugh FEMA director 12-2002 DHS with 22 federal agencies under DHS 13 - Mitigation: a sustained action to reduce or eliminate risk to people and property from hazards and their effects 14- Mitigation involve broad spectrum of participants 15- Preparedness: a state of readiness to respond to a disaster, crisis or any other type of emergency situation 16-Response: first responders to incidents, fire, police, medical personnel to save live, protect property and meet basic human needs 17-Recovery: start in initial hours, days following the event, continue for months/years Communication: critical function, horizontal/vertical comms, preparedness/prevention and mitigation information 18-BCP & EM; ensure survival of an organization/business : data, terrorism 19-EM & New terrorism threats: 20 Attributes to successful EM program: customer focus, statutory/budget, leadership, partnership, comms, training/tools/technology, focus on mitigation

Back

Haddow Ch 2 Case Studies

Front

1- Preparedness cycle 2- programs 3- education and training programs 4-community involvement 5-Case Studies: Washington state EM campaign 6- Tsunami Ready Preparedness Program 7- EMI and Education

Back