Go on. Explore!

lvl 0 • 0 xp

lvl 1

Home Market Decks Interests

politics

memorize.ai (lvl 286)

(0)

10 cards

()

Section 1

Preview this deck

eisenstadt v baird

Front

1 / 10

Politics

0.0

0 reviews

5			0
4			0
3			0
2			0
1			0

Active users

All-time users

Favorites

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (10)

Section 1

(10 cards)

eisenstadt v baird

Front

contraceptives given after a lecture, felony given bc person was single, court says privacy for signle and married

Back

gratz v bollinger

Front

specific point value for race not allowed

Back

johnson v transportation services

Front

he gets job, revoked an given to woman, thi sis okay bc gender can be considered

Back

craig v boren

Front

men 21, women 18, not okay

Back

griswold v connecticut

Front

birth control info given but illegal, no longer illegal bc 14th gives right to privacy in marraiges

Back

roe v wade

Front

abortion is privacy in 1st trimester

Back

grutter v bollinger

Front

using race as "compelling interest" is okay

Back

bakke v university of california

Front

16 of 100 held for minorities but NO rigid racial quotas

Back

reed v reed

Front

seperated parents want sons estate, idaho favors men, but NO under equal protection clause

Back

planned parenthood v casey

Front

undue burden

Back

bradwell v illinois

Front

could not practice law, not garunteed under 14th

Back