Section 1

Preview this deck

Loose constructionist

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (61)

Section 1

(50 cards)

Loose constructionist

Front

Hamilton -the gov. could claim broad powers only implied in the Constitution. Judges have freedom to interpret

Back

US Claims Court

Front

-16 judges appointed by POTUS for 15 year terms-to hear claims dealing with money or currency damages

Back

Petit jury

Front

a jury that decides an individual's innocence or guilt; a trial jury - Usually made up of 6 to 12 people - Weigh the evidence presented at a trial

Back

Dissenting opinion

Front

Back

5 agencies that have important voice in confirmation process

Front

Back

The Bork rejection

Front

Back

Territorial Courts

Front

The con. gives congress power to make rules to govern US territories sooo congress created court system to handle civil, criminal, and constitutional cases

Back

Marbury v. Madison

Front

• Then lame duck president Adams makes a bunch of midnight appointments - hoping to squelch then soon-to-be president Jefferson's ability to appoint anti-federalists to lifelong appointments on the court. • While one of the appointments has been ordered, confirmed etc. it hasn't been sent to the judge in time. • Jefferson is now president and orders his secretary of state to hold the delivery of paperwork to the judge so that it is no longer finalized. • That judge (William Marbury) asked SCOTUS for a writ of mandamus - a court order which forces a government official to take a particular action.

Back

Writ of certiorari

Front

Back

Strict constructionist

Front

Jefferson -national gov. should exercise only the powers specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Judges out to base their decisions on a narrow interpretation of the language of the Constitution.

Back

13th court of appeals for the federal circuit

Front

Back

Court of Appeals

Front

Back

Grand Jury

Front

a group of people who evaluate whether there is enough evidence against a person to order him or her to stand trial - Usually made up of 16-23 people - Hears charges against a person suspected of having committed a crime

Back

Senatorial courtesy

Front

Back

Jurisdiction

Front

-the right to interpret & apply the law; a court's range of authority. -Basically the restrictions on the kinds of cases a court may hear

Back

US v. Virginia (lower court conflicting ruling)

Front

Back

Court of Veterans Appeals

Front

-1988 -Created to handle veterans' war claims for benefits and other veterans' problems

Back

US Tax Court

Front

-All civil (but not criminal) cases are heard in the Tax Court -Most cases are generated by the Internal Revenue Service -Decisions may go to federal court of appeals

Back

Koon v. US (legal question)

Front

Back

Criminal Law

Front

FED STATE & LOCAL are responsible for enforcing criminal law defines crimes against the public order and provides for punishment -most settled in state or local courts -2% reach fed courts -gov (s or f) is always the prosecutor (bringing the charges against the defendant)

Back

Amicus curiae briefs

Front

Back

Original jurisdiction

Front

Trial court where a case is originally tried

Back

Legislative court

Front

narrow scope of court= less cases; not governed by article III as constitutional courts are bc these courts are created by & defined by congress in order to help congress exercise its powers --court of military appeals, us claims court courts of the district of Columbia, territorial courts, court of veterans appeals, US tax court

Back

Concurring opinion

Front

Back

Defendant

Front

person who must defend against the complaint

Back

Constitutional court

Front

District courts, courts of appeals, court of international trade

Back

Civil law

Front

law that govern the relations between individuals AND defines their legal rights

Back

Judicial Review

Front

the power (by SCOTUS) to determine the constitutionality of laws & other actions of gov. -isn't in the Constitution - it is claimed by Chief Justice John Marshall.

Back

Article III

Front

-create SCOTUS & gives Congress ability to set up "lower" aka "inferior" courts. -devoted to judiciary and is even shorted than the Congress & POTUS's sections -provides guidelines for terms of office & compensation

Back

Appellate jurisdiction

Front

The trial court that hears a case being appealed. If a person loses an appeal they may appeal to SCOTUS

Back

Judiciary Act of 1789

Front

-Congress est. a variety of lower courts to handle the rising # of federal cases ?? -Allows for congress to estab. constitutional courts, but over the years they have added legislative courts as well

Back

Selection gridlock

Front

Back

Constitutional law

Front

• Federal courts determine cases based on how each judge interprets the Constitution. • Most cases involving constitutional law decide the limits of gov.'s power & the rights of the indiv

Back

US v. Lanza

Front

SCOTUS held that dual sovereignty is not a violation of double jeopardy protections (as laid out in the 5th amendment.

Back

Equity law

Front

-what civil law is governed by principle which resolves the dispute on grounds of fairness (whoever loses the cases usually pays for the court costs)

Back

The Thomas controversy

Front

Back

Writ of mandamus

Front

-a court order which forces a gov official to take a particular action

Back

Courts of the District of Columbia

Front

Federal district court, court of appeals & local courts to hear civil & criminal cases

Back

Majority opinion

Front

Back

Dual Sovereignty

Front

state and federal authorities can prosecute an individual for the same crime

Back

Concurrent jurisdiction

Front

The authority to hear cases shared by federal and state courts. Cases having concurrent jurisdiction involve citizens of different states, if a person commits a crime that violates both state & fed. court

Back

Plaintiff

Front

person bringing charges in civil suit/trial

Back

District courts

Front

Back

5 sets of criteria used in selecting SCOTUS justices

Front

Back

Duties of SCOTUS & Chief Justice

Front

Back

Exclusive jurisdiction

Front

The authority of the federal courts ALONE to hear and rule in certain cases- cases involving a federal or foreign gov. officials and cases that arise out of an act of Congress as well as disputes between 2 state govs

Back

"Rule of Four"

Front

Back

Shaw v. Hunt (cases w/ significance)

Front

Back

Court of Military Appeals

Front

-Highest appeals court for the armed service-decisions from this court of military appeals may be appealed to SCOTUS (rare) -Hears cases brought from military courts by members of the armed forces convicted of breaking military law

Back

Court of International Trade

Front

-Court hears civil cases related to taxes & trade and is based in NYC but also from harbor or port cities -Judges are in panels of 3 and decisions can be appealed to Court of Appeals on the Federal circuit

Back

Section 2

(11 cards)

Judicial activism

Front

Back

The Warren Court

Front

Back

The Burger Court

Front

Back

Stare decisis

Front

Back

Minersville School District v. Gobitis

Front

Back

Brown v. Board of Education

Front

Back

W. Virginia state Board of Educ. v. Barnette

Front

Back

Judicial restraint

Front

Back

4 checks or limits on judicial power

Front

Back

Issues with implementation

Front

Back

Precendent

Front

Back