Section 1

Preview this deck

common law

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

2

All-time users

2

Favorites

0

Last updated

1 year ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (58)

Section 1

(50 cards)

common law

Front

law created by the courts

Back

regulation

Front

a law promulgated by an administrative agency.

Back

fact bound

Front

Legal questions/issues are

Back

concurrent jurisdiction

Front

when more than one court has jurisdiction to hear a case

Back

statues

Front

enacted by Congress or state legislatures

Back

Appellant/Petitioner

Front

person who files an appeal

Back

Standard of proof in civil cases

Front

preponderance of evidence

Back

trial/appellate and state/federal

Front

The two primary ways in which the parallel court systems are organized

Back

judicial review

Front

The courts have the power to review the constitutionality of statutes.

Back

standard of proof in criminal courts

Front

beyond a reasonable doubt "clear and convincing"

Back

trial courts

Front

Courts that determine answers to questions of fact and questions of law

Back

diversity of citizenship

Front

opposing litigants come from two different states and amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 only applies in civil cases

Back

holding

Front

the courts ruling/decision

Back

jurisprudence

Front

approaches to understanding the law

Back

total preemption

Front

federal government can legislate in a given area

Back

true

Front

criminal defenses can be raised to negate mens rea or justify actus reus

Back

originalism approach

Front

judges attempt to determine what the average person living at the time the constitutional provision was adopted thought it meant at the time

Back

persuasive authority

Front

equal or a lower court from the same jurisdiction or from a higher court in a different jurisdiction.

Back

substantive area of civil law (examples)

Front

torts, contracts, property, divorce

Back

US Supreme Court

Front

The branch of government that has the final say in when a statute is constitutional

Back

common law

Front

The law courts rely on when no constitutional, statutory, or administrative regulations apply.

Back

mandatory authority

Front

higher court in the same jurisdiction

Back

constitution

Front

the fundamental law of a nation or state.

Back

preemption

Front

The term used to describe instances where only the federal government can legislate in a given area

Back

criminal law

Front

The type of law that deals with harm to society as a whole

Back

legal analysis

Front

Identify and review relevant facts Apply the law to relevant facts Review any applicable legal rules

Back

juridiction

Front

The power (ability) of a court to hear a specific case

Back

contextual approach

Front

parts of the same document/similar documents are examined to see how the same words/phrases were used in the related contexts

Back

plain meaning approach

Front

key terms interpreted using the dictionary definitions and ordinary conversations

Back

comparative negligence

Front

When the jury compares the negligence of the plaintiff to that of the defendant.

Back

federal law

Front

The type of law that applies to a legal issue regarding the U.S. Constitutional, a federal statute, or a federal regulation

Back

strict liability

Front

The doctrine under which, a defendant can be made liable even though the defendant was not negligent and did not intend to harm anyone.

Back

stare decisis

Front

the doctrine for relying upon the holdings in prior similar cases

Back

leglislative dominance

Front

the power of Congress to amend a statute if the court incorrectly interprets the meaning (Congress can change the meaning of the law)

Back

federal questions

Front

a federal statue, a federal regulation, or the US constitution

Back

exclusive jurisdiction

Front

when only one court has the power to hear a case

Back

case by case preemption

Front

passing laws that conflict with federal laws ex; marijuana case (Gonzales v. Raich)

Back

legislative history approach

Front

judges attempt to determine what the drafters intended to accomplish by passing the law

Back

commerce clause

Front

power to regulate interstate commerce, among the several states (Gibbons v. Ogden) "interstate commerce"

Back

law

Front

rules of conduct created and enforced by designated governmental bodies

Back

procedural law

Front

Rules that govern how the legal system operates

Back

federal courts

Front

Courts that can hear cases dealing with state law issues if the litigants are from different states and the amount in controversy is over $75,000

Back

necessary and proper clause

Front

power to make laws that are necessary and proper for executing enumerated powers (McCulloch v. MD) "doctrine of implied powers"

Back

limited jurisdiction

Front

Courts that only hear specialized issues for areas such as probate, domestic relations, traffic, juvenile and small claims

Back

judicial branch

Front

The branch of government that has the power to interpret the meaning and constitutionality of regulations

Back

concurring opinion

Front

An opinion that agrees with the decision reached by the majority, but disagrees with the reasoning

Back

ordinance

Front

a law enacted by a local government

Back

cause of action

Front

A claim that, based on the law and the facts, is sufficient to support a lawsuit.

Back

prima facie case

Front

must prove (at the same time); mens rea (bad intention) actus reus (bad act)

Back

Writ of certiorari

Front

an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court

Back

Section 2

(8 cards)

14th amendment due process clause

Front

Doctrine of incorporation, meaning they made the Bill of Rights apply to the states too

Back

statutory law

Front

law enacted by a state legislature or by Congress

Back

checks and balances

Front

ability to limit the actions of the other branches

Back

Bill of rights

Front

first 10 amendments

Back

ex post facto

Front

after the fact

Back

administrative law

Front

comprised of rules and regulations created by administrative agencies

Back

seperation of powers

Front

dividing the powers of government among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches

Back

ex post facto

Front

after the fact

Back