Section 1

Preview this deck

Loose constructionist

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (61)

Section 1

(50 cards)

Loose constructionist

Front

The view that judges have considerable freedom in interpreting the Constitution

Back

Court of Military Appeals

Front

Highest appeals court for the armed services- decisions from this court of military appeals may be appealed to SCOTUS (albeit rare); hears cases brought from military courts by members of the armed forces convicted of breaking military law

Back

Selection gridlock

Front

-Senate must confirm POTUS nominees or things grind to a halt -Rehnquist chastised Senate for not moving on judicial appointments -Senate inaction was creating workloads that would magnify the problem

Back

Courts of the District of Columbia

Front

Federal district court; court of appeals & local courts to hear civil and criminal cases

Back

Concurring opinion

Front

A Supreme Court opinion by one or more justices who agree with the majority's conclusion but wish to offer differing reasons

Back

Original jurisdiction

Front

The court's authority to hear and decide a case for the first time

Back

Constitutional law

Front

The type of law relating to the interpretation of the Constitution

Back

Grand Jury

Front

A group of people who evaluate whether there is evidence against a person to order him or her to stand trial

Back

US. v. Virginia (lower court conflicting ruling)

Front

Constitutionality of the all-male Virginia Military Institute's policy of not admitting women was the primary issue

Back

Precedent

Front

A judicial decision that is used as a standard in later similar cases

Back

Court of International Trade

Front

Hears civil cases related to tariffs and trade. Created in 1890 and was originally called the United States General appraisers

Back

Marbury v. Madison

Front

Federalist John Adams was a lame duck, lost re-election to thomas Jefferson. Adams feared that Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican party would destroy all the Federalists had worked to established. Adams did everything he could in his final days in office to see that the Federalist stamp not be removed from the presidency. He created 59 Federal Judgeships. Marbury's appointment had been confirmed by the Senate, and Adams had even signed the necessary paperwork. It had not yet been delivered to Marbury when Jefferson became President. At Jefferson's request James Madison, the new secretary of state, refused to deliver the commission. Marbury asked the Supreme Court to force Madison to turn over the documents. Marbury argued that the Judiciary Act of 1789 compelled Madison to do so through the Writ of Mandamus.

Back

Article III

Front

Devoted to the judiciary, consists of three short sections; specifically creates only the Supreme Court and gives Congress the power to create lower federal courts, or "inferior courts"; provides guidelines of the terms of office and compensation of federal judges; create SCOTUS & gives Congress ability to set up "lower: courts

Back

Appellate jurisdiction

Front

The court's authority to hear cases on appeal; if a person who loses a case in a trial court wants to appeal a decision, may take the case to court with appellate jurisdiction

Back

Duties of SCOTUS & Chief Justice

Front

Justices: Deciding which cases to hear from among the thousands appealed to the Court each year, deciding the case itself, explaining the decision, dealing with requests for social legal actions that come from their assigned circuits, presiding over sessions and conferences

Back

Jurisdiction

Front

The right to interpret and apply the law; a court's range of authority

Back

The Thomas controversy

Front

In 1991, President Bush nominated Clarence Thomas, a controversial member of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia as a Supreme COurt Justice. He refused to answer questions about his constitutional views. He would press his conservative views into active policy making. Information had been leaked to the press that a former associate of Judge Thomas, Anita Hill, had accused him of sexually harassing her when she worked in the Dept. of Education. Thomas Denied the claims, narrowly escaped rejection by the closest Supreme Court confirmation vote in modern times, 52 to 48

Back

Petit jury

Front

A jury that decides an individual's innocence or guilt; a trial jury

Back

Exclusive jurisdiction

Front

The authority of the federal courts alone to hear and rule in certain cases; when a federal criminal law is broken, but not a state one, the case goes to federal court

Back

Defendant

Front

One against whom a legal charge has been made

Back

Shaw v. Hunt (cases w/ significance)

Front

Court struck down congressional districts, holding that race should not be the sole factor in drawing district boundaries

Back

Judiciary Act of 1789

Front

Established lower federal courts

Back

Court of Appeals

Front

Created by Congress in 1891 because so many people were appealing cases to the Supreme Court that the Court could not handle them; Today 13 courts of appeals handle about 41,000 cases a year, a figure that has almost doubled every ten years since 1970. The US is divided into 12 judicial circuits, one of which is the District of Columbia. A justice of the SC is assigned to each circuit

Back

Stare Decisis

Front

Let the decision stand; the practice of basing legal decisions on established Supreme Court precedents from similar cases

Back

Plaintiff

Front

Brings charges in a civil suit against a defendant; a person who files suit in a civil case

Back

Senatorial courtesy

Front

The practice in which a presidential nomination is submitted initially for approval to the senators from the nominee's state

Back

Dissenting opinion

Front

A Supreme Court opinion by one or more justices in the minority who oppose the ruling

Back

"Rule of Four"

Front

Permits four of the nine justices to grant a writ of certiorari

Back

Criminal Law

Front

Law that defines crimes against the public order and provides for punishment; the type of law dealing with crimes and providing for their punishment

Back

Dual Sovereignty

Front

Allows the double prosecution of a person by more than one state for the same crime, where both states have jurisdiction for the prosecution, and notwithstanding the double jeopardy rule; double jeopardy

Back

Strict constructionist

Front

The view that judges ought to base their decisions on a narrow interpretation of the language of the Constitution

Back

Koon v. US (legal question)

Front

California appeals court disagreed with the trial judge's sentence given to police officers accused of beating African-American motorist Rodney King. The SC took the case and sent it back to the California courts for reconsideration.

Back

US v. Lanza

Front

The Supreme Court has upheld the dual sovereignty; When the same act is an offense against both state and federal governments, its prosecution and punishment by the latter, after prosecution and punishment by the former, is not double jeopardy within the Fifth Amendment

Back

Writ of mandamus

Front

A court order that commands a government official to take a particular action

Back

Judicial Review

Front

The power of the courts to establish the constitutionality of national, state, or local acts of government

Back

Civil law

Front

The law that governs the relations between individuals and defines their legal rights ; the type of law dealing with the rights and relationships of private citizens

Back

Amicus curiae briefs

Front

A person or group who is not a party to an action, but has a strong interest in the matter, will petition the court for permission to submit a brief in the action with the intent of influencing the court's decision

Back

District courts

Front

Created in 1789 by Congress; general trial courts of the United States federal court system. Both civil and criminal cases are filed in the district court, which is a court of law, equity, and admiralty

Back

Concurrent jurisdiction

Front

The authority to hear cases shared by federal and state courts; federal and state courts share jurisdiction

Back

Equity law

Front

A particular set of remedies and associated procedures involved with civil law

Back

Constitutional court

Front

A federal court with constitutionality based powers and whose judges serve for life. The most important are the Supreme Court, the courts of appeals, and the district courts

Back

US Tax Court

Front

All civil cases involving taxes are heard in Tax Court. Most cases come from IRS & Treasury- these decisions are appealable to federal court of appeals

Back

Writ of certiorari

Front

An order to send up the case record because of a claim that the lower court mishandled the case

Back

Majority opinion

Front

The view of the Supreme Court justices who agree with a particular ruling

Back

Legislative court

Front

A specialized court established to hear cases about and execute the legislative powers of Congress

Back

Court of Veterans Appeals

Front

Congress set up this court to hear veterans' war claims for benefits & other veterans' problems

Back

The Bork rejection

Front

In 1987, the senate rejected President Reagan's nominee for the seat vacated when Lewis F. Powell stepped down from the Court. He was a highly intelligent, learned man who would defer to Congress and state legislatures and adhere to the principles set by past court decisions. His critics saw him as a judicial activist who would overturn previous decisions and ignore Congress in order to achieve his extremely conservative political ends. The Senate voted 58 to 42 against Bork's confirmation

Back

US Claims Court

Front

16 judges appointed by POTUS for 15 years- to hear claims about monetary damages; can't sue the US gov't without consent (Congress makes the list upon claims)- even if found guilty Congress would have to appropriate the money

Back

Territorial Court

Front

Constitution gives Congress power to make rules to govern US territories so Congress created court system to handle civil, criminal and constitutional cases

Back

13th court of appeals for the federal circuit

Front

Hears cases from all across the nation from the legislative courts and from district courts in certain cases, such as those involving patents, trademarks, or copyrights.

Back

Section 2

(11 cards)

Congress

Front

-Checks the judiciary -Impeaches judges or justices -Alters the organization of the federal court system -Amends the Constitution -Congress may also re-pass a bill deemed unconstitutional only slightly altering the law which -Would restrict the remedies that courts imposed

Back

Brown v. Board of Education

Front

Judicial activists argued that the rights of African Americans were ignored for decades by Congress and Presidents. The Court led the other branches in policy-making. The result was justice where it had previously been denied

Back

4 checks or limits on judicial power

Front

Limited Powers of Enforcement, Congress, The President, and Public opinion

Back

Limited Powers of Enforcement

Front

A judge has no police force or army. People can get away with ignoring a court order for a long period of time

Back

The Burger Court

Front

Liberalism does not necessarily mean activism. Richard Nixon chose Warren Burger, a conservative judge on the D.O.C. Court of Appeals as chief justice. This moderate Court followed the activist tradition, knocking down 34 statutes compared to the Warren Court's 25. Burger Court narrowed defendants rights but also upheld women's rights to an abortion, required school busing in certain cases, and upheld affirmative action programs

Back

Judicial activism

Front

The belief that SC justices should actively make policy and sometimes redefine the Constitution

Back

Judicial restraint

Front

The belief that Supreme Court justices should actively make policy and sometimes redefine the Constitution

Back

W. Virginia state Board of Educ. v. Barnette

Front

Court ruled that mandatory flag salute laws in public schools interfere with the free exercise of religion. In supporting a family that considered the flag a "graven image," and thus against their religious beliefs, that Court overturned the earlier Minersville School District v. Gobitis in which the Court had upheld the school policies

Back

The Warren Court

Front

Known for its liberal views. Led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Court rulings strengthened desegregation efforts and the civil liberties and rights of defendants. However, the actions of other Courts through the years illustrate that conservatism does not equal restraint, and liberalism does not equal activism

Back

The President

Front

POTUS checks the judiciary by appointing justices and enforcing or not the Court's decisions

Back

Public Opinion

Front

If SCOTUS strays too far from public opinion the backlash can make the decision impossible to apply and weaken the Court's authority

Back