Section 1

Preview this deck

What are the sources of law?

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (60)

Section 1

(50 cards)

What are the sources of law?

Front

Statutes Constitution Administrative Regulations Common Law

Back

Judicial Branch

Front

judges interpret the law

Back

Structuralism

Front

Evaluates design of laws and how they were configured.

Back

Dual Sovereignty

Front

Can prosecute same act in federal and state court because two different systems of government.

Back

Due Process (Limit)

Front

5th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to the federal government and the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to the states. There are 5 doctrines of Due Process

Back

Appeals

Front

After defendant found guilty, an appeal is available often about legal ruling by judge, about evidence, or jury action.

Back

Defense Counsel

Front

Serve to represent clients within bounds of the law.

Back

Release

Front

Release of a defendant to assist with defendant and continue a regular life. Prosecutor prefers defendant stay in jail to prevent more criminal behavior or opportunity to flee.

Back

Civil Law Objectives

Front

about money and spreading the loss, making victim whole, injunctive relief

Back

Ex Post Facto (Limit)

Front

"From a thing done afterward" The Constitution prohibits the federal and state legislatures from enacting laws which are retroactive Reflect principle of legality Laws must be prospective in application only

Back

Prosecutors

Front

Represent the government, enforces federal government laws, have discretion in whether to bring a case and what charges to file. ONLY ONES WHO CAN INITIATE CRIMINAL CHARGES!!

Back

Administrative Regulations

Front

EPA, FDA, can write the law but the agencies cannot create crimes with impunity

Back

Criminal Law

Front

About the public, designed to morally condemn and punish violators.

Back

Trial

Front

Jury selection or de-selection and jury instructions which are given by the judge to the jury to guide them which are often standardized but can be customized.

Back

Plea Bargaining

Front

Occurs in almost all cases and yields resolution in more than 90% of cases, serves as a trial proxy.

Back

Federal Powers

Front

federal powers are given by the Constitution, to make a law need an enumerated power to allow them to do so

Back

Executive Branch

Front

police and prosecutors enforce the law

Back

Common Law

Front

what the law used to be, basis for many state criminal laws, England (1400s-1800s)

Back

Judges

Front

Make rulings about the law, what evidence is admissible, supervise the trial proceedings including jury.

Back

Powers

Front

Federal vs state

Back

Civil Law

Front

About private law and private parties, intended to settle disputes

Back

Legislative Branch

Front

legislators create and enact law (RICO Act - allows prosecution of conspiracies and organized crime)

Back

Objectives of Criminal Law

Front

Retribution: individual loses a right due to prior actions (prison). Deterrence: opposite of retribution, creates incentives to avoid criminal behavior, can be general (public) or specific (person).

Back

Text

Front

Text of the law; focus on actual words of the statute and use plain meaning of the words.

Back

The Principle of Legality

Front

No crime without law Requires fair notice and fair warning of what is criminal Retroactive crime creation is unacceptable Comes from England

Back

Criminal Law Burden of Proof

Front

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, burden on the state

Back

Civil Law Evidence

Front

needed

Back

Incorporation Doctrine (Limit of Due Process)

Front

Selectively applies the Bill of Rights to limit the states, courts applied the amendments selectively to states depending on whether the amendment was believed to be fundamental to the American scheme of ordered liberty.

Back

Criminal Law Evidence

Front

needed

Back

The Model Penal Code

Front

not law and has no binding effect but has been the model for many state criminal codes and has influential force, written by the American Law Institute.

Back

Kansas v. Hendricks Rule

Front

If a law is so punitive in purpose of effect then it is criminal, not civil law The court will reject the legislature's manifest intent only where a party challenging the statute provides the clearest proof that the statutory scheme is so punitive either in purpose or effect as to negate the state's intention to deem it civil.

Back

Bills of Attainder (Limit)

Front

Constitution prohibits laws that punish specific individuals or members of a group without the benefit of a judicial trial. Cannot impose some form of punishment prior to a judicial trial.

Back

Charging Instruments

Front

Formally charged with a crime, includes prosecutor's information (pieces of paper filed by prosecutors with charges and essential facts that provides defendant with notice), grand jury indictment, affidavits, notices to appear.

Back

Post-Trial

Front

If defendant found not guilty the case usually ends. If defendant found guilty often more motions about release and trial, then sentencing occurs.

Back

Civil Law Burden of Proof

Front

Preponderance of the evidence, burden on either party

Back

Intent

Front

Courts look to the intent of lawmakers and legislative if the text of a statute is not clear.

Back

Motions

Front

Motion to dismiss and motion to suppress is common.

Back

Contextualism

Front

Views laws and Constitution within contexts (history, politics, cultures)

Back

Double Jeopardy (Limit)

Front

Being prosecuted or sentenced twice for substantially the same offense is prohibited.

Back

Discovery

Front

Reciprocity, more likely a resolution without trial.

Back

State Powers

Front

Police powers 1. Health 2. Safety 3. Welfare 4. Morals

Back

Dynamic Interpretation of the law

Front

interpret the terms in light of evolving public policy

Back

Equal Protection (Limit)

Front

Guarantee that the government must treat a person or class of persons the same as it treats other persons or classes in like circumstances, legislation cannot affect a fundamental right or involve suspect classification.

Back

Originalism

Front

A type of textualism associated with constitutional interpretation, examines meaning of a text at the time the law or constitutional provision was adopted.

Back

Jury

Front

The triers of the facts, alleged criminal behavior does not become a crime until a jury or judge finds it is so and a judgment of conviction is entered.

Back

Constitution

Front

doesn't really give a source of criminal law (treason, only)

Back

Pre-Trial

Front

Where most cases get resolved, criminal cases rarely reach trial, where discovery occurs.

Back

Policy

Front

Used when the text and intent analysis don't yield a satisfactory interpretation to supplement or supplant the text and intent exploration

Back

Statutes

Front

where crime mostly comes from today; are proposed, written, and sponsored by special interest groups such as lobbying entities.

Back

Canons of Interpreting Statutes

Front

Text Intent Policy

Back

Section 2

(10 cards)

Void for Vagueness Doctrine (Limit of Due Process)

Front

A law is unconstitutional if it fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that their conduct is forbidden. Prohibits criminal laws from being so vague that reasonable people must necessarily guess as to the meaning of the law and its application.

Back

Papachristou v. Jacksonville

Front

The Jacksonville vagrancy ordinance is void because it lends itself to the danger of unbridled police discretion in its enforcement. Laws must provide fair notice and warning to potential violators and have ascertainable standards by which to determine guilt or innocence.

Back

Procedural Due Process

Front

Requires the government to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property (FAIRNESS). People are owed a process - either notice and/or hearing

Back

Substantive Due Process (limit)

Front

Right to liberty under the Due Process clause gives the full right to engage in conduct without intervention of the government (PRIVACY). Some things can't be criminalized by the government

Back

Basic Due Process

Front

5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution Criminal laws must be fundamentally fair to be properly applied Laws must be reasonable and people must be given fair notice A state law cannot apply without fair notice

Back

In re Winship

Front

The due process clause requires that all elements of a crime be proven by the government beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required not only in criminal cases, but in juvenile adjudications as well.

Back

Lawrence v. Texas

Front

The Supreme Court struck down a state law criminalizing sodomy because it violated substantive due process.

Back

Duncan v. Louisiana

Front

Incorporation The U.S. Constitution was violated when the plaintiff's demand for a jury trial was refused when he was charged with simple battery because a trial by jury in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice. The Bill of Rights directly limits only the federal government and the 14th Amendment due process clause has been interpreted to selectively apply them to the states.

Back

Keeler v. Superior Court

Front

When a new penal statute is applied retroactively to make punishable an act which was not criminal at the time it was performed, the defendant has been given no advance notice consistent with due process.

Back

State v. Williams

Front

Negligence can be criminal There is a duty to act Both defendants guilty because they had a parental duty to provide medical care for a defendant minor child

Back