Statutes
Constitution
Administrative Regulations
Common Law
Back
Judicial Branch
Front
judges interpret the law
Back
Structuralism
Front
Evaluates design of laws and how they were configured.
Back
Dual Sovereignty
Front
Can prosecute same act in federal and state court because two different systems of government.
Back
Due Process (Limit)
Front
5th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to the federal government and the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause applies to the states.
There are 5 doctrines of Due Process
Back
Appeals
Front
After defendant found guilty, an appeal is available often about legal ruling by judge, about evidence, or jury action.
Back
Defense Counsel
Front
Serve to represent clients within bounds of the law.
Back
Release
Front
Release of a defendant to assist with defendant and continue a regular life. Prosecutor prefers defendant stay in jail to prevent more criminal behavior or opportunity to flee.
Back
Civil Law Objectives
Front
about money and spreading the loss, making victim whole, injunctive relief
Back
Ex Post Facto (Limit)
Front
"From a thing done afterward"
The Constitution prohibits the federal and state legislatures from enacting laws which are retroactive
Reflect principle of legality
Laws must be prospective in application only
Back
Prosecutors
Front
Represent the government, enforces federal government laws, have discretion in whether to bring a case and what charges to file. ONLY ONES WHO CAN INITIATE CRIMINAL CHARGES!!
Back
Administrative Regulations
Front
EPA, FDA, can write the law but the agencies cannot create crimes with impunity
Back
Criminal Law
Front
About the public, designed to morally condemn and punish violators.
Back
Trial
Front
Jury selection or de-selection and jury instructions which are given by the judge to the jury to guide them which are often standardized but can be customized.
Back
Plea Bargaining
Front
Occurs in almost all cases and yields resolution in more than 90% of cases, serves as a trial proxy.
Back
Federal Powers
Front
federal powers are given by the Constitution, to make a law need an enumerated power to allow them to do so
Back
Executive Branch
Front
police and prosecutors enforce the law
Back
Common Law
Front
what the law used to be, basis for many state criminal laws, England (1400s-1800s)
Back
Judges
Front
Make rulings about the law, what evidence is admissible, supervise the trial proceedings including jury.
Back
Powers
Front
Federal vs state
Back
Civil Law
Front
About private law and private parties, intended to settle disputes
Back
Legislative Branch
Front
legislators create and enact law (RICO Act - allows prosecution of conspiracies and organized crime)
Back
Objectives of Criminal Law
Front
Retribution: individual loses a right due to prior actions (prison).
Deterrence: opposite of retribution, creates incentives to avoid criminal behavior, can be general (public) or specific (person).
Back
Text
Front
Text of the law; focus on actual words of the statute and use plain meaning of the words.
Back
The Principle of Legality
Front
No crime without law
Requires fair notice and fair warning of what is criminal
Retroactive crime creation is unacceptable
Comes from England
Back
Criminal Law Burden of Proof
Front
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, burden on the state
Back
Civil Law Evidence
Front
needed
Back
Incorporation Doctrine (Limit of Due Process)
Front
Selectively applies the Bill of Rights to limit the states, courts applied the amendments selectively to states depending on whether the amendment was believed to be fundamental to the American scheme of ordered liberty.
Back
Criminal Law Evidence
Front
needed
Back
The Model Penal Code
Front
not law and has no binding effect but has been the model for many state criminal codes and has influential force, written by the American Law Institute.
Back
Kansas v. Hendricks Rule
Front
If a law is so punitive in purpose of effect then it is criminal, not civil law
The court will reject the legislature's manifest intent only where a party challenging the statute provides the clearest proof that the statutory scheme is so punitive either in purpose or effect as to negate the state's intention to deem it civil.
Back
Bills of Attainder (Limit)
Front
Constitution prohibits laws that punish specific individuals or members of a group without the benefit of a judicial trial.
Cannot impose some form of punishment prior to a judicial trial.
Back
Charging Instruments
Front
Formally charged with a crime, includes prosecutor's information (pieces of paper filed by prosecutors with charges and essential facts that provides defendant with notice), grand jury indictment, affidavits, notices to appear.
Back
Post-Trial
Front
If defendant found not guilty the case usually ends. If defendant found guilty often more motions about release and trial, then sentencing occurs.
Back
Civil Law Burden of Proof
Front
Preponderance of the evidence, burden on either party
Back
Intent
Front
Courts look to the intent of lawmakers and legislative if the text of a statute is not clear.
Back
Motions
Front
Motion to dismiss and motion to suppress is common.
Back
Contextualism
Front
Views laws and Constitution within contexts (history, politics, cultures)
Back
Double Jeopardy (Limit)
Front
Being prosecuted or sentenced twice for substantially the same offense is prohibited.
Back
Discovery
Front
Reciprocity, more likely a resolution without trial.
Back
State Powers
Front
Police powers
1. Health
2. Safety
3. Welfare
4. Morals
Back
Dynamic Interpretation of the law
Front
interpret the terms in light of evolving public policy
Back
Equal Protection (Limit)
Front
Guarantee that the government must treat a person or class of persons the same as it treats other persons or classes in like circumstances, legislation cannot affect a fundamental right or involve suspect classification.
Back
Originalism
Front
A type of textualism associated with constitutional interpretation, examines meaning of a text at the time the law or constitutional provision was adopted.
Back
Jury
Front
The triers of the facts, alleged criminal behavior does not become a crime until a jury or judge finds it is so and a judgment of conviction is entered.
Back
Constitution
Front
doesn't really give a source of criminal law (treason, only)
Back
Pre-Trial
Front
Where most cases get resolved, criminal cases rarely reach trial, where discovery occurs.
Back
Policy
Front
Used when the text and intent analysis don't yield a satisfactory interpretation to supplement or supplant the text and intent exploration
Back
Statutes
Front
where crime mostly comes from today; are proposed, written, and sponsored by special interest groups such as lobbying entities.
Back
Canons of Interpreting Statutes
Front
Text
Intent
Policy
Back
Section 2
(10 cards)
Void for Vagueness Doctrine (Limit of Due Process)
Front
A law is unconstitutional if it fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that their conduct is forbidden.
Prohibits criminal laws from being so vague that reasonable people must necessarily guess as to the meaning of the law and its application.
Back
Papachristou v. Jacksonville
Front
The Jacksonville vagrancy ordinance is void because it lends itself to the danger of unbridled police discretion in its enforcement.
Laws must provide fair notice and warning to potential violators and have ascertainable standards by which to determine guilt or innocence.
Back
Procedural Due Process
Front
Requires the government to follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property (FAIRNESS).
People are owed a process - either notice and/or hearing
Back
Substantive Due Process (limit)
Front
Right to liberty under the Due Process clause gives the full right to engage in conduct without intervention of the government (PRIVACY).
Some things can't be criminalized by the government
Back
Basic Due Process
Front
5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution
Criminal laws must be fundamentally fair to be properly applied
Laws must be reasonable and people must be given fair notice
A state law cannot apply without fair notice
Back
In re Winship
Front
The due process clause requires that all elements of a crime be proven by the government beyond a reasonable doubt.
Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is required not only in criminal cases, but in juvenile adjudications as well.
Back
Lawrence v. Texas
Front
The Supreme Court struck down a state law criminalizing sodomy because it violated substantive due process.
Back
Duncan v. Louisiana
Front
Incorporation
The U.S. Constitution was violated when the plaintiff's demand for a jury trial was refused when he was charged with simple battery because a trial by jury in criminal cases is fundamental to the American scheme of justice.
The Bill of Rights directly limits only the federal government and the 14th Amendment due process clause has been interpreted to selectively apply them to the states.
Back
Keeler v. Superior Court
Front
When a new penal statute is applied retroactively to make punishable an act which was not criminal at the time it was performed, the defendant has been given no advance notice consistent with due process.
Back
State v. Williams
Front
Negligence can be criminal
There is a duty to act
Both defendants guilty because they had a parental duty to provide medical care for a defendant minor child