Because React is a small library focused on building UI components, it is necessarily different than a lot of other JavaScript frameworks.
For example, AngularJS (1.x) approaches building an application by extending HTML markup and injecting various constructs (e.g. Directives, Controllers, Services) at runtime. As a result, AngularJS is very opinionated about the greater architecture of your application — these abstractions are certainly useful in some cases, but in many situations, they come at the cost of flexibility.
By contrast, React focuses exclusively on the creation of components, and has few (if any) opinions about an application's architecture. This allows a developer an incredible amount of flexibility in choosing the architecture they deem "best" — though it also places the responsibility of choosing (or building) those parts on the developer.
I recently migrated an application originally written in AngularJS to React, and one of the things I loved most was...
By comparing and contrasting React with another library, not only can you demonstrate a deep understanding of React but also position yourself as a strong candidate by highlighting your experience.
Be prepared to be asked some follow-up questions as well, such as:
Under what circumstances would you choose React over (AngularJS, etc)?
If React only focuses on a small part of building UI components, can you explain some pitfalls one might encounter when developing a large application?
If you were rewriting an AngularJS application in React, how much code could you expect to re-use?