Evidence obtained illegally (without a warrant or improperly obtained with a warrant) may not be used at trial against the victim of the search
Back
Lawful arrest
Front
Anyone arrested may be searched
Back
A defendant is not guilty of an act if...
Front
They were forced to commit it
Back
Mens Rea
Front
Criminal intent (state of mind)
Back
TN's Response to Kelo v. City of New London
Front
Private benefit/indirect public benefit does not mean public benefit; exemptions: quasi-governmental utility, urban renewal or redevelopment plan in a blighted area
Back
Adjudication
Front
Hearing cases
Back
Obergefell v. Hodges
Front
2015 states obligated to recognize same-sex marriage from other states
Back
Plain view
Front
The evidence is not concealed
Back
Supremacy Clause
Front
Federal law is supreme over state law
Back
Strict scrutiny
Front
Based on race, ethnicity, and fundamental rights
Back
Citizens United v. FEC
Front
2010 decision by Supreme Court holding that corps. are free speech protected by the 1st Amendment
Back
Appointment
Front
President nominates judges/justices & heads of administrative agencies
Back
What does the 1st Amendment say?
Front
"Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech"
Back
Dormant Commerce Clause
Front
Used to prohibit state legislation that discriminates against interstate or international commerce
Back
Commerce Clause
Front
Clause stating that congress can regulate interstate and international commerce
Back
Obscenity
Front
1. Appeals to prurient interests, taken as a whole, using community standards;
2. Depicts or describes patently offensive sexual conduct described by state law;
3. Lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
Back
No expectation of privacy
Front
The police have a right to search any area in which the defendant does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy
Back
Actus Reus
Front
Illegal Act
Back
Takings Clause
Front
Government can take private property for a public purpose, but it must provide fair compensation
Back
Legal speech may be limited by...
Front
Time, place, manner
Back
Article 3
Front
Creates SC, allows congress to make lower courts, 2 key functions: adjudication & judicial review
Back
Miranda Rights
Front
Police must read to someone when being arrested: right to remain silent, anything they say can/will be held against them, and right to a lawyer
Back
Substantive Due Process
Front
Some rights are so fundamental that the government may not take them (voting, speech, travel, privacy)
Back
Automobiles
Front
If lawfully stopped for other reasons, and evidence is visible, police may search entire car
Back
4th Amendment
Front
Prohibits illegal searches and seizures
Back
Article 1
Front
Established congress with 2 houses, gives congress power, regulates commerce between states
Back
14th Amendment
Front
Equal rights of citizens
Back
Stop and frisk
Front
May search a suspect if there is good reason to believe he may be armed
Back
Self-incrimination
Front
The prosecution may not use coercion to force a confession from a suspect, suspect may refuse to answer any questions that could be used to convict him
Back
Kelo v. City of New London
Front
Eminent domain case: local governments may force the sale of private property and make way for private economic development when officials decide it would benefit the public
Back
Judicial Review
Front
Allows the court to determine the constitutionality of laws
Back
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
Front
2014 allowed for-profit corporations to be exempt from a law its owners religiously object to if there is a less restrictive means of furthering the law's interest
Back
Articles of Confederation
Front
First governing document of the US, it didn't give the federal government any power to raise money or regulate commerce
Back
Minimal scrutiny
Front
Based on economic and social discrimination
Back
May search without a warrant if:
Front
1. Plain view
2. Stop and frisk
3. Emergencies
4. Automobiles
5. Lawful arrest
6. Consent
7. No expectation of privacy
Back
Emergencies
Front
Such as in a chase; suspect may be searched
Back
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Front
1st amendment question: is it actually conveying a message?
Back
Consent
Front
If consent is given by the lawful occupant of the home, police may search it
Back
Fifth Amendment
Front
Due process and takings clause
Back
Procedural Due Process
Front
Government must go through procedures to ensure that the result is fair
Back
Foreign Policy (president)
Front
Coordinates international efforts, negotiates treaties, commander in chief of the military, cannot declare war
Back
Double Jeopardy
Front
A defendant may only be tried once for a particular offense, no matter what is found later
Back
Checks and Balances
Front
A system that allows each branch of government to limit the powers of the other branches in order to prevent abuse of power
Back
Section 2
(50 cards)
Verbal defamation is...
Front
slander (damages = must be proven)
Back
Written defamation is...
Front
libel (damages = presumed)
Back
Strict liability
Front
Liable regardless of state of mind
Back
Arson
Front
Using fire or explosives to damage or destroy property, usually with either malicious or fraudulent intent
Back
Duty to Invitees
Front
To exercise reasonable care to protect invitees against dangerous conditions possessor should know of but invitees are unlikely to discover
Back
8th Amendment
Front
Prohibits cruel/unusual punishment
Back
Res Ipa Loquitur
Front
"The thing speaks for itself"- Negligence is obvious and the incident would not have happened if negligence did not occur.
Back
Theft of Honest Services
Front
The theft of honest services statute prohibits public and private employees from taking bribes or kickback
Back
Larceny
Front
The trespassory taking of personal property with the intent to steal it
Back
Crimes Committed by Business
Front
If someone commits a crime within the scope of his employment and to benefit the corporation, the company is liable
Back
Goals of Racketeering
Front
invest or acquire business, maintain a business using criminal activity, operate a business using criminal activity
Back
Duty to Trespassers
Front
Not to injure intentionally
Back
Slander/libel per se
Front
Some statements are so harsh and potentially damaging that the plaintiff is assumed to be damaged and does not have to prove injury
- Accusations of committing a serious crime
- Claims of having a sexually transmitted disease or of being an unchaste woman (gender bias in the law)
- Alleged professional incompetence
Back
Intentional tort
Front
Doesn't require intention to harm the victim, only intention to perform the act
Back
Assault
Front
Action that causes the victim to fear an imminent battery
Back
Business torts
Front
Intentional torts that occur almost exclusively in a business setting
Back
Defamation
Front
Irresponsible speech to harm another's reputation
Back
Absolute privilege
Front
A witness testifying in a court or legislature may never be sued for defamation
Back
Racketeering Acts
Front
Includes but not limited to embezzlement, arson, mail fraud, wire fraud
Back
4 facts to prove to win defamation suit...
Front
1. Statement was actually made
2. Statement is false
3. Communicated to someone other than plaintiff
4. Plaintiff must show injury from statement
Back
Public personalities
Front
Have a harder time winning because they have to prove the defendant acted with ACTUAL MALICE
Back
Defenses to criminal charges
Front
Infancy, involuntary intoxication, insanity, consent, duress, self-defense, entrapment, statute of limitations, and immunity
Back
Qualified privilege
Front
When info is legitimately needed, speaker giving it has this
Back
Wrongful death
Front
Improper killing of another
Back
Negligence per se
Front
If you break a law, they assume duty and breach
Back
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
Front
Prohibits using 2+ racketeering acts to accomplish certain goals, aimed at organized crime
Back
Alcohol and Dram Shop Laws
Front
If they are under 21 and intoxicated, whoever served them is directly liable
Back
Duty to Child Trespassers
Front
If man-made item attracts children, landowner may be liable
Back
Punitive damages
Front
Damages intended to punish the defendant for conduct that is extreme and outrageous
Back
Wife/Mail Fraud
Front
Wire and mail fraud are additional federal crimes involving the use of interstate mail, telegram, telephone, radio, or television to obtain property by deceit
Back
Hiring and retention
Front
Company can be sued if they don't check and due diligence
Back
Embezzlement
Front
Fraudulent conversion of someone else's property already in the defendant's possession
Back
Opinions
Front
Opinions are NOT defamation
Back
Shopkeeper's privilege
Front
Store may detain a person suspected of shoplifting if there is a reasonable basis for the charge and the detention is done reasonable
Back
False imprisonment
Front
The restraint of someone against their will and without reasonable cause
Back
Fraud
Front
Injuring another person by deliberate deception
Back
6th Amendment
Front
Right to a lawyer, speedy trial, impartial jury
Back
Crimes that harm businesses
Front
Larceny, fraud, embezzlement, wire/mail fraud, theft of honest services, arson
Back
Battery
Front
Touching of another person in a way that is unwanted or offensive
Back
Duty to Licensees
Front
To warn of known, but hidden dangerous conditions licensees are unlikely to discover for themselves
Back
Categories of tort law
Front
Intentional torts, negligence, strict liability
Back
Lanham Act
Front
Protection against false statements intended to hurt another's business
Back
Intentional infliction of emotional distress
Front
An intentional tort in which the harm results from extreme and outrageous conduct that causes serious emotional harm
Back
Conversion
Front
Taking/using someone's property without consent
Back
Compensatory damages
Front
Money intended to restore a plaintiff to the position she was in before the injury
Back
Trespass
Front
Intentionally entering land that belongs to someone else or remaining after being asked to leave
Back
Negligence rule
Front
1. Duty
2. Breach (acting unreasonably under the cirumstances)
3. Causation (factual and proximate)
4. Damages
Back
Fraud
Front
Deception for the purpose of taking money or property from someone
Back
Negligence
Front
Careless, but culpable
Back
Tort Law
Front
Violation of duty based on law
Back
Section 3
(18 cards)
Non-economic damages usually may not exceed...
Front
3x the economic damages or a flat cap such as $250k
Back
Ultra hazardous activities
Front
Defendants are almost always held liable for harm, plaintiff does not have to prove breach or foreseeable harm
Back
TN cap for non-economic damages is...
Front
$750k or $1M for catastrophic damages
Back
In most cases, the jury can award...
Front
Whatever seems reasonable for economic damages
Back
Comparative negligence
Front
In most states, if the plaintiff is negligent, a percentage of negligence is applied to both the defendant and the plaintiff
Back
Consumer expectation
Front
If less safe than expected the manufacturer would be liable
Back
Types of product liability
Front
- Negligent design
- Negligent manufacture
- Failure to warn
Back
Defenses to Negligence
Front
- Superseding cause
- Contributory/comparative negligence
- Assumption of the risk
Back
Damages must be...
Front
Genuine and single recovery for past, present, future
Back
Statute of Limitation
Front
Usually 1 to 5 years from when defect was discovered
Back
Modified comparative negligence
Front
- 50% Bar (0 recovery if 50% or more; reduced by % if less; TN)
- 51% Bar (0 recovery if 51% or more; reduced by % if less)
Back
Tort reform
Front
About half the states have passed statutory limits on tort awards
Back
Assumption of the risk
Front
A person who voluntarily enters a situation that has an obvious danger cannot complain if she is injured
- This rule applies to a situation where the danger is well-known and the participant chooses to be present
Back
Statute of Repose
Front
Absolute limit on bringing the case
Back
Defective products
Front
1. sells defective product, unreasonably dangerous, seller is in business of selling, and reaches consumer without substantial change
2. #1 is true, even if seller exercised care and has no contractual relationship with the seller
Back
A bystander, unharmed physically, may recover for emotional distress if...
Front
- She was near the scene of the injury,
- Seeing injury caused immediate shock &
- She is a close relative of the physically harmed victim
Back
Risk-utility
Front
- Value of the product
- Gravity of the danger
- Likelihood of danger
- Feasibility of a safer design
- Adverse consequences of alternative design
Back
Contributory negligence
Front
In a few states, if the plaintiff is AT ALL negligent, he cannot recover damages from the defendant