Section 1

Preview this deck

English as a Second Language/Pull-Out

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

7 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (16)

Section 1

(16 cards)

English as a Second Language/Pull-Out

Front

English program that serves students with limited English proficiency in English by providing only a part-time teacher certified to provide English language arts instruction exclusively, while student remains in a mainstream instructional arrangement in other content areas

Back

1974 Lau v. Nichols

Front

Suit by Chinese parent in San Francisco leads to ruling that identical education does not constitute equal education under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. School districts must take affirmative steps to overcome educational barriers faced by non-English speakers. Established that the Office for Civil Rights, under the former Department of Health, Education and Welfare, has the authority to establish regulations for Title VI enforcement. A Supreme Court ruling that impacted language minority students.

Back

Two-way dual language Immersion

Front

Integrate language minority students and fluent English speakers in the same classroom with the goal of academic excellence & Bilingual Proficiency for both student groups

Back

English as a Second Language/Content-Based

Front

English program that serves students with limited English proficiency in English only by providing a full-time teacher certified to provide supplementary instruction for all content-area instruction

Back

2007 English Language Proficiency Standards

Front

Listening, speaking, reading, writing added to TEKS as well as standards for Learning Strategies

Back

Dual Language Immersion Program

Front

Instruction is provided in 2 languages; 1 language is used at a time; learning is based on shared language experiences during peer interactions

Back

1995 Texas Education Code (TX Admin. Code)

Front

Districts with 20 or more English-proficient students in the same grade level must offer a bilingual education program for ELL's in gr. K-5. (If less than 20 only an ESL program)

Back

1981- Plyler vs. Doe

Front

The Supreme Court struck down a Texas law as unconstitutional, thereby granting undocumented immigrant children the right to a free public education

Back

1994 Amendments to Title VII

Front

New provisions reinforced professional development programs & increased attention to the maintenance of home languages

Back

1968 Title VII Bilingual Education Act of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)

Front

Establish Federal policy for bil. Education; provide supplemental funding for programs; 1st acknowledgment of effects of poverty & educational disadvantages faced by cultural minorities

Back

1974 - Equal Educational Opportunities Act (EEOA)

Front

Defined what constitutes denial of equal educational opportunity (language barriers)

Back

4 models of bilingual education programs (TX)

Front

Transitional Bilingual/Early Exit; Transitional Bilingual/Late Exit; Dual Language Immersion/Two-Way; Dual Language Immersion/One-Way

Back

Language Immersion

Front

Method of teaching in which the target language is used as both content and the language of instruction

Back

1988 Amendment to Title VII

Front

Expanded funding for "special alternative programs" where only English is used & established a 3 year limit on participation in most Title VII

Back

No Child Left Behind

Front

To ensure that all children make adequate yearly progress

Back

1981- Castaneda v Pickard

Front

The Fifth Circuit of Appeals determined that the Raymondville, Texas school district's langage remediation programs violated the Equal Education Opportunities Act of 1974. They set up some basic standards to determine school district compliance with the EEOA. "Castaneda Test" was created. 1. Theory- the school must have a program based on sound educational theory. 2.Practice- The school must devote the personnel and resources needed to translate the "theory" into reality. 3. Results- The school must not continue a program that fails to produce results.

Back