- when they lose
- if they win, they are state heroes
Back
Without a real, usable, and agreed-upon definition of terrorism we have begun
Front
- over utilizing the word terrorism to the point of absolute dilution
- makes it impossible to formulate or enforce agreements against terrorism or understand the use of extraordinary violence that is the hallmark of terrorism
Back
Gus Martin
Front
- work turns the focus on the structure and the target of the organization rather than the purpose of the action
- work notes that terrorism today is understood to involve loose, cell based networks that wage politically motivated, asymmetrical violence against non-military targets
Back
The Uniting Against Terrorism report
Front
- reiterates this message of innocents, claiming that no action, even a struggle for self-determination, allows for the deliberate killing or maiming civilians and non-combatants
Back
What is interesting about the FBI's definition?
Front
- definition adds the previously unmentioned and specific term of property
Back
The question of _____ is present in all definitions of terrorism, but it is not necessarily _____ toward humans
Front
violence
Back
The distinction between a criminal act and a terrorist act can be found in where?
Front
- in the result of the actions
- criminal act is done for profit
- terrorist has the goal of change through fear or intimidation
Back
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) definition
Front
- " The unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
Back
What is the inherent problem with Lacquer's question regarding legitimate terrorism?
Front
- if there is real tyranny occurring, a small terror group should not be the only ones recognizing or acting against it
- In cases of real tyranny, shouldn't the world audience recognize it as such and come to the aid of those being tyrannized?
Back
Sons of Liberty
Front
- Before the American revolution a group of small men took to burning effigies and damaging or destroying homes of officials participating in the 1765 Snap act
- Members were non state actors whose goal was to subvert government and incite change, using extraordinary violence and destruction of property
- not traditionally called terrorists bc they won their revolution
Back
The contemporary problem with defining terrorism is?
Front
the overuse of the word
Back
What is the foundation of the difference between terrorism and war?
Front
- War is never a surprise
- force employed by a state is seen as legitimate, while violence employed by a non-state actor is not
Back
Robespierre recommended_____ as a systematic tool in reaching the goals of the state
Front
terrorism
Back
Terror just for the sake of fear, without purpose and just to kill is?
Front
not terrorism
Back
The paths to radicalization are varied but can be partially explained using what three components?
Front
- rational models
- psychological models
- cultural and organizational influence
Back
Revolution
Front
- where citizens rally together and attempt to overthrow their existing government or societal system
- first actions of violence taken in the name of a revolution may be perceived as terrorism
Back
Walter Laqueur
Front
- one of the grandfather of terrorism research
- asks if there is ever a "legitimate use" of terrorism
- " The vagueness— indeed the utter carelessness— with which the term is used, not only in the media but also in government announcements and by academic students of the subject."
Back
why are assassinations and kidnappings rarely included in definitions of terrorism?
Front
- because such a term creates difficult limitations
- because they are specific acts committed by a variety of people for a variety of reasons
- element of financial gain= criminal actions
Back
Are terrorists mentally unstable?
Front
- very rarely
- the rate of mental illness in terrorists is lower than the rate found in the general world population
Back
What is interesting about the FBI's international terrorism definition?
Front
- the transference of what would be illegal in this country to what is occurring in other countries
- notable bc they have no international jurisdiction or authority
- also the presence of the terms assassination and kidnapping
Back
What is interesting about the CIA's definition of terrorism?
Front
- the limitation of the definition is the victim pool: they must be noncombatants
- Given this definition, the combing of the Marine barracks in 1983 by the group Islamic Jihad would no longer be classified as a terrorist event
Back
If change is the goal of violent action in terrorism the violent action alone is ?
Front
not terrorism
Back
Theodore Kaczynski
Front
- isolated himself in montana
- sent anonymous letters to several perceived enemies, including the US gov, the entertainment industry, and corporate tech
- sent bombs in mail to universities
- paranoid schizophrenic
Back
Binyamin Netanyahu
Front
- introduced a concept in his definition of terrorism stating that terrorism is " the deliberate and systematic murder, maiming, and menacing of the innocent to inspire fear for political ends"
Back
Geneve Convention's 1949 "Protection of Civilian Persons in a Time of War"
Front
- prevents the "mutilation, cruel treatment, and torture" of prisoners and noncombatants
- used as a foundation for persecuting war criminals in the Hague International Criminal Courts
Back
Gib's writings tie back to who's thinking?
Front
- Robespierre
- "terror is nothing other than justice" and can serve as a tool of statecraft
Back
Rational Choice
Front
- says that humans act in ways that are beneficial to them— they work toward their own self-interests
-
Back
Radicalization
Front
- the process of change and indoctrination
- a person comes to believe that extremist/terrorist views are normal and appropriate
Back
Rajneeshee religious cult in Oregon in 1984 attacks
Front
- goal was to influence a local election by eliminating a large portion of the surrounding population
- example of dissident religious terrorism
Back
Carl von Clausewitz
Front
- famous war theoretician
- stated that war is compromised of "primordial violence, hatred, and enmity, which are to be regarded as blind, natural force."
- was meant to apply to traditional warfare
- now fits non-state actors just as well as state actors
Back
Are the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting and 2012 Sandy Hook shootings examples of terrorism?
Front
- no
- gunmen were lone wolves who were mentally ill with no purpose or political motivation
- acts had no virtue
- not symbolic of a regime or government or political body
Back
What is important of the DoD definition?
Front
- definition focuses on fear and coercion and looks at the goals of the event,
- ignores the type of victim as a determinant to what constitutes terrorism
Back
Punctuated Event
Front
- circumstances that can have critical impacts on the radicalization of a person
- they can create an atmosphere within a person that simplifies or accelerates radicalization
- These events can add distrust or dissatisfaction of the population and may foster activity to counter the event
Back
When is Genocide terrorism?
Front
- If the goal of violence is strictly exterminating a group of people perceived as undesirable— referred to euphemistically as "ethnic cleansing" by the perpetrators
- could possibly be tabled as state-sponsored terrorism
Back
The presence and the roles of ____ in terrorist acts, has often created the distinction between a terrorist act and other events
Front
innocents
Back
The 2006 report Uniting Against Terrorism-Recommendations for a Global Counter terrorism Strategy focused on?
Front
- the moral aspects of terrorism that focus on hyper nationalistic and xenophobic messages that glorify mass murder and martyrdom
- placed an emphasis on terrorist attitudes and beliefs
Back
Schmid and Jungmann identified?
Front
- several commonalities in existing definitions in order to assess their gaps
Back
Kofi Annan
Front
- former Secretary General of the UN,
- wanted to bridge the gap between acts of extraordinary violence and the concern raised by the Islamic Organization Countries
- Felt that a single definition might blur the difference between terrorism and the legitimate struggle against foreign occupation
Back
xenophobia
Front
- Hatred of others who are different from you
Back
When was the term terrorism first used?
Front
- coined by Maximillian Robespierre during the Reign of Terror
- associated with the French Revolution
- term had a positive connotation at the time
Back
hyper nationalistic
Front
- a fervent love of your own nation
Back
Overuse of the word terrorism does what?
Front
- makes it difficult to understand the specific character of what the term really is
- inflates stats
- makes us immune to the term
Back
Why is it difficult to discuss international counterterrorism agendas and programs and agree upon and pursue anti-terror partnerships around the world?
Front
- there is no agreed-upon definition of terrorism
Back
All terrorist organizations?
Front
- want something
- want to change a societal trend and for a variety of reasons they chose terrorism as a tool to achieve this
Back
The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) definition of terrorism
Front
- "The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological."
Back
Change movement+ violence =
Front
terrorism
Back
CIA definition of terrorism
Front
- "Terrorism is premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents"
Back
It is only when u combine____ with acts of _____, you do get a unique and interesting attempt at defining terrorists
Front
- psychological traits
- extraordinary violence
Back
What is the inherent problem with Martin's definition regarding terrorism?
Front
- The structure of an organization should not be a determining factor in defining terrorism
- terrorists do not have to be part of a cell to carry out an attack
- ex: UNAbomber
Back
Robespierre said/emphasized what?
Front
- emphasize that terrorism was the: combination of violence with purpose or the combination of virtue and terror
- "Virtue, without which terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless. Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible"
Back
Section 2
(42 cards)
Second floor of staircase
Front
- third step
- involves the potential terrorist learning to displace his anger or aggression
- once they do this they are ready to advance to the next step
Back
Saul Smilansky
Front
- looked for examples of truly justifiable terrorism
- found that places where terrorism may be justified (violence to protect a society or group against a repressive government or faction), it did not flourish
- In places where terrorism flourished, it was not justified
Back
Forcing an opponent to change policy or direction by threatening violence against them, is cornerstone of?
Front
terrorism as a tool
Back
Defining an event as terrorism, or a person as a terrorist is?
Front
- a function of perspective
- one mans terrorist is one mans freedom fighter
Back
Thomas Schelling
Front
- wrote that military force can be used to inflict "hurt" on an enemy, and the fear of that hurt can motivate the opponent to avoid it
- "the power to hurt is bargaining power, To exploit its diplomacy— vicious diplomacy, but diplomacy"
Back
Madrid Train Bombings
Front
- 2004
- 10 explosive devices detonated on four commuter trains
- AQ took responsibility
- resulted in
Spanish socialist workers party winning national elections and the Spanish withdrawing US support in Iraq
Back
Fifth floor of staircase
Front
- prepares the terrorist to carry out an attack that will kill or cause injury
- By expanding on the previous moral engagement, the target is branded as an outsider or "them"
Back
Staircase to Terrorism
Front
- Developed by Fathali Moghaddam
- describes the psychological process that leads to terrorism using the metaphor of climbing a staircase
Back
Syndrome model fails to?
Front
- address why so few people (relatively) actually turn to violent extremism and terrorism to bring about social change
- implies that when a given individual is exposed to the various root causes, they can evolve into terrorists (obviously not the case)
Back
Terrorist exchange their _____ for the reward of furthering their goal?
Front
- limited resources
- Terrorists operate on a different moral frame work than you do
Back
Moral Engagement
Front
- how a new recruit aligns himself with the moral beliefs of the terrorist organization
- involves instilling a belief that perceived injustices (suffered during previous steps of the staircase) are from a shared enemy
Back
Methods of moral disengagement and cognitive reconstrual typically include?
Front
- isolation from previous contacts, immersion into the new belief system, and the creation of fear and distrust in others
- allow the terrorist organization to subvert existing moral systems and replace them with its own
Back
First floor of staircase
Front
- the second step
- revolves around attempts at social mobility
- the person on this floor is seeking solutions and opportunities to correct the injustice
- If opportunities for legitimate (non-extremist) improvement and correction of the perceived loss are available, that may end the climb of the staircase
Back
Punctuated events are also critical in?
Front
- driving public policy decisions and they may foster or encourage extremism and terrorism
- they also bring acknowledgement or notoriety to the perpetrators of the attack and those who report and cover the stories
Back
Fourth floor cements what mindset?
Front
- "us versus them"
- prepares individuals for the fifth and final floor
Back
what are the problems with the staircase model?
Front
- progression is predetermined
- the path of radicalization is varied
- potential terrorists may move up or down on the staircase, possibly never reaching the next step or carrying out a terrorist attack
- model also does not allow a person to skip a step
Back
what is the issue in explaining terrorism as a tool?
Front
- it removes terrorism as something we are fighting and requires us to better define our enemy
Back
This entire process of the staircase models builds on the new moral framework adopted on?
Front
the third floor
- allows the terrorist to sidestep moral mechanisms that typically precent extraordinary violence and murder
Back
When a terrorist organization employs terrorism, it is displaying "vicious" diplomatic power; it is using?
Front
coercion as a tactic
Back
Given the rational choice theory and the no mental health deficits, how de we explain the tendency or ability of some terror orgs to commit extraordinary violence resulting in massive losses of life?
Front
- answer lies in how we define self interest
- Terrorists are rational actors and have their own self interests
Back
relative deprivation
Front
- loss or perceived loss that is disproportionate to the rest of society— overall dissatisfaction may lead the person to proceed to the first floor of staircase
- important because it allows even those who are very poor to differentiate themselves from the rest of their social strata or peers
- someone with expectations or threat of losing what little he has is suffering
Back
Martha Crenshaw
Front
wrote that terrorism is a group activity, involving intimate relationships among a small number of ppl
Back
while terrorism in many cases can be a justifiable tool of the oppressed_____
Front
examples of this in practice are rare or nonexistent
Back
Displaced aggression demonstrates?
Front
- how anti-American sentiment in the Middle East is actually the populace's anger at their one governments redirected to the United States
Back
The staircase model is designed as an?
Front
explanatory framework
- a tool to help us understand the progression of the person to extremism and terrorism
Back
The tendency to view our current era as "The Global War on Terrorism" GWOT does what?
Front
- conveys a sense that the US is in struggle with a single enemy, a global organization, or at least a group of like minded individuals
Back
Once someone reaches the fourth floor of the staircase can they go back down?
Front
no, attempting to leave the group or move back down the staircase is no longer possible
Back
Once a new recruit is immersed into the terrorist organization, he feels the ____of the new organization (by outsiders or the government)
Front
"persecution"
- this feeds his shift in moral frameworks, making the overall moral engagement easier
Back
Terrorism as a tool
Front
- does a better job of explaining how on person, in a given society, and pressured by the same factors, can choose terrorism while 50 others do not
- fits the global conditions we face today bc of the wide range terrorist organizations and goals, and lacking a single "terrorist profile"
Back
How do we morally separate terrorism from murder? Justified killing? Warfare?
Front
1. Who the attackers are
2. Who they are attacking
3. The intent of the attackers
Back
Marc Sageman
Front
- a researcher who interviewed and reviewed the biographies of over 170 terrorists, found that in his sample, the rate of mental illness was lower than the rate found in the general world population
Back
What are the key components in a coercive bargain?
Front
1. The terrorist must have the demonstrated ability to cause harm
2. The coercive bargain implies that if the attackers demands were met, the attacker will refrain from further attacks
Back
Robespierre suggested that a person can employ terrorism as?
Front
a tool
- employ terrorism as a tactic
Back
Third floor of staircase
Front
- fourth step
- introduces a would-be terrorist to an actual terrorist group
- moral engagement happens here
- cognitive reconstrual happens here
Back
The choice of counter activities against a punctuated event will be influenced by? where on the path to terrorism a person is, as well as the cultural or moral frame the person employs
Front
- where on the path to terrorism a person is
- as well as the cultural or moral frame the person employs
Back
Fourth floor of staircase
Front
- person has fully entered the terrorist organization and is developing skills and abilities to further the goals of the group
- the new terrorist is trained or given specific abilities and specializations to support the organization
Back
cognitive reconstrual
Front
- the morals of an individual are changed
- usually includes dehumanizing any human targets, creating psychological bridge that makes killing easier
Back
"Ground Floor" of Staircase
Front
- is where many of us reside
- individuals focus on material conditions and self improvements within society
- relative deprivation
Back
____ is almost always a driver of extremist behavior
Front
relative deprivation
Back
Why does terrorism still exist?
Front
because it works
- it "works" in the sense that brings attention and support to the cause of the organization, even while the overall goal may remain out of reach
Back
The relationship between the individual and the group?
Front
- builds trust and solidarity among the terrorists and reinforces the organization's belief system
- the support system is critical to the ongoing participation of the individual
Back
Psychological syndrome models are based on?
Front
- discovering the "root cause" of terrorism; factors such as poverty, political impotence, lack of education, declining GDP