Unintentional conduct, consent, defense of the self
Back
The Erin Andrews case discussed in class involved which of the following
Front
Intrusion
Back
Which of the following is NOT a defense to the tort of negligence
Front
consent
Back
Proximate cause deals with
Front
Reasonably foreseeable causation
Back
The most likely defense to a frivolous lawsuit would be a counterclaim for
Front
Abuse of process
Back
Appropriation is
Front
A tort that is typically reserved for celebrities and other public figures
Back
What duty is owed to a stranger in peril?
Front
None
Back
Strict liability is typically seen in
Front
Dog
Back
Trespass to property
Front
involves a minor interference with personal property of another
Back
Self defense
Front
Allows the use of lethal forces in some circumstances
Back
Comparative negligence
Front
A legal theory that reduces the plaintiffs recovery by their percentage of fault, up to 50%, beyond which point they recover nothing.
Back
actual malice is required
Front
In the tort of defamation when the plaintiff is a public figure
Back
Assault requires
Front
Placing someone in fear of an imminent harmful contact
Back
When establishing a duty of care, how many of the above ways must be proven?
Front
1
Back
Assumption of the risk is
Front
A defense involving inherently risky activities
Back
In negligence action, the legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff to collect the entire judgement from any of the defendants (when there are more than one defendant) is known as
Front
Joint and several liability
Back
Negligence is an intentional tort
Front
false
Back
A battery can occur
Front
With unintentional contact BUT intentional contact
Back
Trespass to land
Front
Involves the trespass onto realestate of another
Back
In order to prove the tort of negligence, the plaintiff must
Front
Show that the defendant breached a duty of care
Back
Defamation is a tort that
Front
can be either spoken or written
Back
The "castle rule"
Front
Is an exception to the rule that one must first exhaust their means of escape before they can defend themselves
Back
Joint and several liability is
Front
A theory where each defendant is responsible for the entire judgement
Back
Assault is a tort that is
Front
An intentional tort
Back
In contact sports, the defense most likely used against a battery would be
Front
Consent
Back
Negligence serves the purposes of tort law by
Front
Compensating the plaintiff, punishing the defendant, deterring wrongful conduct
Back
How many different types of causation are there in a negligence case?
Front
2
Back
Intentional inlfiction of emotional distress
Front
Requires proof of extreme and outrageous conduct, requires severe emotional distress, typically requires emotional distress be proven with medical testimony
Back
How many elements are there to the tort of negligence