Business Law I Exam I Haskell Murray Belmont (Chs 1, 4, 6, 5, 7)

Business Law I Exam I Haskell Murray Belmont (Chs 1, 4, 6, 5, 7)

memorize.aimemorize.ai (lvl 286)
Section 1

Preview this deck

Contemporary law sources

Front

Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%
Star 0%

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Active users

0

All-time users

0

Favorites

0

Last updated

6 years ago

Date created

Mar 1, 2020

Cards (131)

Section 1

(50 cards)

Contemporary law sources

Front

US and state constitutions statutes common law court orders administrative law treatises

Back

legislative branch

Front

makes laws

Back

statute

Front

law created by legislature

Back

natural law

Front

an unjust law is no law at all and need not be obeyed. laws must have a good moral basis

Back

independent agencies

Front

heads of agencies are selected by agency

Back

precedent only is binding for

Front

US and State Supreme Court

Back

case citation

Front

Plaintiff, defendant, reporter (Court, Year).

Back

state constitution functions

Front

create state executive, legislative, and judicial systems

Back

precedent

Front

an action or official decision that can be used as support for later actions or decisions

Back

legislative history and intent

Front

sometimes the court can look to the reasons behind the statutory law to determine the legislators' intent. floor debates

Back

public law

Front

sets the duties of government to its citizens

Back

court orders

Front

judge-made orders binding on individuals/corporations

Back

statutory law

Front

must pass by majority in both houses. If vetoed, need 2/3+ vote in both houses

Back

public policy

Front

the courts will use accepted social policies to interpret statutory law, such as reducing crime or providing education to interpret a law

Back

legal realism

Front

enforcement of the law is more important than the law itself. enforcers determine if the law is applied in a fair and consistent way

Back

jurisprudence

Front

the study of law

Back

criminal law steps

Front

dangerous behavior outlawed by society government prosecutes accused guilt is determined punishment or fine is imposed

Back

treatises

Front

president with foreign nations ratified by the Senate with at least 2/3 vote

Back

Stare Decisis

Front

"let the decision stand"

Back

executive agencies

Front

the president and hire/fire heads of agencies at will

Back

IRAAC

Front

Issue Rule Argument 1 Argument 2 Conclusion

Back

law

Front

body of rules of action or conduct prescribed by controlling authority, and having binding legal force

Back

Where is precedent binding?

Front

only in lower courts of the same system

Back

examples of independent agencies

Front

FTC, FC, USSEC, EPA

Back

an agency is created when

Front

congress passes enabling legislation, which describes a problem and defines the agency's powers. both federal and state

Back

three branches of government

Front

legislative executive judicial

Back

Civil law steps

Front

regulates rights and duties of parties victim, not government, brings suit guilt not determined compensation is ordered

Back

interpretive rules

Front

do no change the law; they define or apply the laws to new situations

Back

administrative law

Front

generally created by Congress

Back

informal rulemaking

Front

proposed rule must be published and public allowed to comment

Back

common law

Front

judge-made law; accumulation of precedent

Back

judicial branch

Front

interprets laws

Back

United State Constitution functions

Front

establishes Congress, the Presidency and Courts gives to states powers not given to Federal government guarantees basic rights to all citizens

Back

civil law

Front

A law that governs relationships between individuals and defines their legal rights

Back

Supreme Law of the Land

Front

United States Constitution

Back

Administrative Procedure Act

Front

regulates agencies in attempt to reduce controversy

Back

legislative rules

Front

require businesses and people to act a certain way; have the effect of a Congressional statute

Back

private law

Front

regulates duties between individuals

Back

formal rulemaking

Front

must hold a public hearing before establishing the rule

Back

legal positivism

Front

law is what the sovereign says it is. Decisions stand, regardless or morality

Back

civil law only looks at

Front

statute, not the precedent or common law

Back

substantive law

Front

defines the rights of the people

Back

primary sources of law

Front

constitutions, statutes, administrative regulations, case law

Back

federal system consists of

Front

US Supreme Court 11 Circuit court systems

Back

examples of executive agencies

Front

FDA, FBI, IRS, USDA

Back

bill

Front

proposed statute

Back

procedural law

Front

establishes processes for settling disputes

Back

secondary sources of law

Front

treatises, restatements, law review articles

Back

plain meaning rule

Front

courts must use the common sense definition of words in the statute

Back

executive branch

Front

enforces laws

Back

Section 2

(50 cards)

peremptory

Front

(adj.) having the nature of a command that leaves no opportunity for debate, denial, or refusal; offensively self-assured, dictatorial; determined, resolute

Back

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Front

other formal or informal methods used to settle disputes without resulting to a trial/appeals

Back

for cause

Front

probable bias

Back

venue

Front

most appropriate physical location for trial

Back

federal question

Front

if it arises under US Constitution, federal statute, or federal treaty

Back

negotiation

Front

two parties work it out themselves; no one is neutral

Back

house of representative members

Front

based on population; max 435 total reps

Back

diversity jurisdiction

Front

Fed courts have this when 1)plantiff and defendant are citizens of different states AND 2)amount in dispute exceeds $75,000

Back

long arm statute

Front

A state statute that permits a state to exercise jurisdiction over nonresident defendants

Back

for purposes of the motion to dismiss, court

Front

assumes the facts in the complaint are true

Back

litigation

Front

process of filing claims in courts that ultimately proceed toward or to trial/appeals

Back

voir dire

Front

Jury selection process of questioning prospective jurors, to ascertain their qualifications and determine any basis for challenge.

Back

subpoena duces tecum

Front

court order for a person or documents to appear in court as long as it is reasonable, not unduly burdensome, and not privileged

Back

contingency

Front

lawyers only get paid if you get paid; usually 35-40% of the earnings

Back

res judicata

Front

matter already judged; other courts respect initial court decision

Back

exclusive federal jurisdiction subject matter

Front

federal crimes, bankruptcy, intellectual property

Back

burden of proof

Front

the obligation facing a persuasive speaker to prove that a change from current policy is necessary

Back

personal jurisdiction

Front

power over person; resident of the state, formal steps to defend the lawsuit, summons is served on the defendant, long arm statute applies

Back

delta symbol

Front

defendant

Back

before a court can hear a case, it is required that there is

Front

jurisdiction, venue, and standing

Back

statutory control

Front

the enabling legislation that created the agency places controls on it through requirements and restrictions

Back

mediation

Front

two parties and mediator; mediator is neutral

Back

standing

Front

you have to be personally affected by fault in order to sue

Back

motion for summary judgement

Front

filed by any party before trial, affidavits and discovery considered, fact considered in the light of most favorable to the non-moving party, no genuine issues of material fact, not a test of credibility

Back

motion to dismiss

Front

A pleading in which a defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim fails to state a cause of action (that is, has no basis in law) or that there are other grounds on which a suit should be dismissed

Back

directed verdict

Front

A ruling made by a judge during a trial, stating that there are no facts in dispute and that the case can be decided on legal issues alone

Back

supoena

Front

Court order for a person or documents to appear in court

Back

in criminal cases, venues are

Front

where the crime happened

Back

exclusive state jurisdiction subject matter

Front

cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction; i.e. divorce and adoption

Back

deposition

Front

testimony taken before trial under oath. limited to 7 hours in one day

Back

political control

Front

the president has control over agencies through political pressure and through nominations of agency heads. and firing, if part of executive branch congress controls budgets of agencies congress can amend enabling legislation to place limits

Back

subject matter jurisdiction

Front

power over subject matter

Back

where venues may be

Front

area where event leading to dispute took place where the parties reside

Back

two places in which businesses are residence

Front

headquarters where they are incorporated

Back

pi symbol

Front

plaintiff

Back

judicial review

Front

Allows the court to determine the constitutionality of laws

Back

Article 1 of the constitution

Front

splits congress into two houses: house of representatives and senate

Back

exceptions to standing

Front

minors and mentally incompetent persons

Back

in civil cases, venues are

Front

where the defendant resides

Back

Freedom of Information Act

Front

allows any citizen to request information from an agency

Back

interrogatories

Front

25 written questions where attorneys help draft responses

Back

State courts

Front

circuit, criminal and chancery courts court of appeals and court of criminal appeals State supreme courts

Back

reasons to grant motion to dismiss

Front

lack of subject-matter jurisdiction lack of personal jurisdiction improper venue insufficient process insufficient service of process failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted failure to join an indispensable party

Back

Privacy Act

Front

prohibits agencies from giving information about an individual to other agencies without consent. some exceptions

Back

Senate

Front

2 members from each state

Back

arbitration

Front

neutral 3rd party makes decision for two parties

Back

Marbury v Madison

Front

John Adam's midnight appointments = William Marbury. Madison withheld the papers. Marbury request an Act of Congress to get papers. Result: Supreme Court strikes this down claiming that this act is unconstitutional. = judicial review

Back

Federal courts

Front

US District Courts US Court of Appeals for 1 of 11 circuits supreme court of US

Back

concurrent jurisdiction subject matter

Front

most cases involving federal questions, diversity-of-citizenship cases

Back

in rem jurisdiction

Front

power over property; where you own property in a state with less than minimum contacts

Back

Section 3

(31 cards)

appointment

Front

president nominates federal judges and heads of most administrative agencies

Back

obscenity

Front

prurient interest using community standards depicts or describes patently offensive sexual conduct described by state law lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

Back

intermediate scrutiny

Front

gender. government classifications are sometimes upheld

Back

strict scrutiny

Front

races, ethnicity, and fundamental rights. classifications based on any of these are almost never upheld

Back

substantial effect rule

Front

congress may regulate any activity which has a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce

Back

foreign policy

Front

president coordinates international efforts, negotiates treaties and is the commander in chief of the military, but can't declare war

Back

substantive due process

Front

some rights (voting, speech, travel, privacy) are so fundamental that the government generally may not take them

Back

adjudication

Front

federal courts hear civil and criminal cases within their jurisdiction

Back

legislation

Front

president and his advisors can propose bills to congress and the president can veto bills from congress

Back

article ii address

Front

executive power

Back

hate speech

Front

words that attack groups such as racial, ethnic, religious, and sexual minorities

Back

congress regulates

Front

commerce

Back

political speech

Front

about a politician or political process is protected, and can be found illegal only if it is intended and likely to promote imminent lawless conduct

Back

legislative branch checks and balances

Front

passes laws passes budget override vetoes confirms judges

Back

judicial activism

Front

eagerness to rule on many issues

Back

judicial restraint

Front

ruling only on issues that are clearly constitutional questions

Back

commerce

Front

state regulated; can't discriminate other states

Back

minimal scrutiny

Front

economic and social relations. government actions that classify people or corporations on these bees are almost always upheld

Back

speech includes

Front

nonverbal communication

Back

commercial speech

Front

designed to propose a commercial transaction -- regulated more strictly than other speech and may be outlawed if false or misleading

Back

procedural due process

Front

government must go through procedures to ensure result is fair. the process due is in proportion to what the government is trying to take from the person

Back

supremacy clause

Front

constitution is the supreme law of the land

Back

14th amendment

Front

1) Citizenship for African Americans, 2) Repeal of 3/5 Compromise, 3) Denial of former confederate officials from holding national or state office, 4) Repudiate (reject) confederate debts

Back

fighting words

Front

speech that directly incites damaging conduct

Back

executive branch checks and balances

Front

vetoes laws appoints judges

Back

the takings clause

Front

when the government takes private property for public use, it must pay a fair price

Back

article 1 gives congress the power to

Front

create and enact legislation impose taxes spend money create copyrights support the military declare war

Back

judicial branch check and balances

Front

declares laws and executive actions unconstitutional

Back

5th amendment

Front

Criminal Proceedings; Due Process; Eminent Domain; Double Jeopardy; Protection from Self incrimination

Back

article iii addresses

Front

judicial power

Back

dormant commerce law

Front

congress can intervene if a state is stopping inner state commerce

Back